Investors
in sentence
4087 examples of Investors in a sentence
As a result, many emerging countries, with their higher interest rates and promising growth prospects, have become irresistibly attractive to
investors.
Indeed, privatization was all the more bizarre as a policy choice because it was doomed in advance:
investors
clearly would not be attracted to buy assets where property rights might change once a legitimate Iraqi government took over – a huge impediment to investment in Kosovo as well.
From the outset, the Trump administration has maintained a pro-business attitude, exemplified by his commitment to deregulation, raising hopes among
investors
of a boost to the US and global economies.
For Japan, this undermined the transmission of monetary easing in international financial markets – a mechanism that was already strained by risk-averse
investors
flocking to the Japanese yen as a safe-haven currency.
Private
investors
are then granted significant tax incentives to reinvest their unrealized capital gains into OZs through “Opportunity Funds.”
OFs can choose the nature of the assets (the risk/return profiles) they offer their investors, but must be organized as corporations or partnerships, which invest at least 90% of their capital in OZs.
It is possible that OFs will displace rather than develop low-income areas, and that the lion’s share of the benefits will accrue to
investors
and developers who already have stakes in locations that qualify for OZ designation.
To ensure that the program benefits distressed communities, and not just wealthy investors, governors will have to choose wisely when designating low-income zip codes as OZs.
In PFS contracts, a government raises private funds from
investors
and uses these funds to pay external organizations (often non-profits) to provide essential social services.
Taxpayers bear no financial risk, because the government pays a return to
investors
only if a contractor meets predetermined targets.
Of the 27 completed projects that have reported to date, only one has failed to achieve its target and pay a return to its
investors.
Many countries continue to limit foreign investment and ownership in specific sectors, restrict their pension funds’ foreign-investment positions, and limit foreign investors’ access to local stock markets.
Deepening capital markets would also benefit local savers and open new channels for foreign
investors
to diversify.
Chinese traders and
investors
have in recent years moved in as Japan and South Korea, two of North Korea’s longstanding trade partners, have withdrawn, owing to official sanctions and increasing public irritation with the North’s intransigent behavior.
But it is being implemented mainly at the community level through partnerships among local governments, community groups, philanthropic organizations, and for-profit
investors.
Private
investors
and philanthropic organizations finance the upfront costs of the pilot projects, and local or state governments (sometimes supplemented with federal money) pay the
investors
only if the project produces the promised results.
The city of Chicago has launched a similar but larger project for $17 million, with upfront funding from some of the same
investors
as in Utah.
Of course, though these changes open the way for philanthropic foundations and pension funds to become major
investors
in pay-for-success projects, success is not guaranteed.
But that is exactly how the approach is supposed to work: risk-conscious investors, rather than taxpayers, assume the upfront financial costs of innovating.
In the case of Greece, some
investors
and commentators may sympathize with the authorities’ contention that austerity measures have only hampered its recovery.
Lax financing conditions may prevail for quite a long time, but, sooner or later, growing external and fiscal deficits become unsustainable; confidence evaporates and
investors
flee, taking their liquidity with them.
The crisis then spills over borders:
investors
overreact and withdraw their money from the entire region.
As a result, fear could become a self-fulfilling prophecy: following a run by
investors
on all other sovereign debtors in the union, fiscal transfers would become inevitable in order to rescue overextended – for example, German – banks that have highly risky loan portfolios.
On the contrary, his belligerent rhetoric and inept governance scared off investors, inciting economic decline and boosting unemployment and poverty.
But investors, managers, and entrepreneurs must take risks if their ideas stand any chance of achieving commercial success.
But the Fed’s recent signals of an early exit from QE – together with stronger evidence of China’s slowdown and Chinese, Japanese, and European central bankers’ failure to provide the additional monetary easing that
investors
expected – dealt emerging markets an additional blow.
Until recently,
investors
hoped that the US Federal Reserve would do whatever it takes to avoid a recession, because that is what it did on previous occasions.
Investors
will reevaluate opportunities for undertaking new initiatives.
The most forward-thinking private
investors
are already searching for any green investment that offers a reasonable yield.
The US could benefit from such policies, as capital-account regulation would force
investors
to find opportunities at home, while a true global reserve currency would free the US from concerns – and harsh rebukes – about the implications of its monetary policy on the global economy.
Back
Next
Related words
Their
Foreign
Would
Financial
Markets
Which
Market
Companies
Private
Assets
Capital
Rates
Other
About
Interest
Government
Institutional
Countries
Global
Economic