Example collocations logo

Inequality in sentence

2932 examples of Inequality in a sentence

Inequality and corruption are the main obstacles.
More importantly, inequality of opportunity is very high as well.
In terms of global life expectancy, total world wealth, the overall level of technology, growth prospects in emerging economies, and global income distribution, things look rather good, while on still other dimensions – say, global warming or domestic income inequality and its effects on countries’ social solidarity – they look bad.
We decided to use the Gini coefficient, a common measure of income inequality, to measure inequality in carbon emissions.
Meanwhile, long-term problems – including climate change and other environmental threats, and increasing inequality in most countries around the world – have not gone away.
More progressive taxation, in effect redistributing income from the top to the middle and bottom, would simultaneously reduce inequality and increase employment by boosting total demand.
Fixation on the deficit will induce cutbacks in social spending, worsening inequality.
Unsustainable fiscal deficits, questionable trade policy, a high level of inequality, crumbling infrastructure, underperforming schools, and unaffordable health care are the result of domestic choices.
Second, Russia’s high degree of economic inequality sustains the majority’s preference for redistribution rather than private entrepreneurship.
Great inequality makes us hungrier for goods than we would otherwise be, by constantly reminding us that we have less than the next person.
The forces of globalization that were liberated by the fall of Communism have created a better world, with rapid economic convergence and shrinking inequality.
And the worldwide Gini coefficient of inter-country inequality fell from 0.653 to 0.556 from 1980 to 2007, owing largely to the astounding performance of the emerging countries, particularly China and India.
Those policies increased inequality, deepened the divide between northern and southern member states, and slowed economic recovery.
Any strategy to address the problems underpinning low productivity growth – from inadequate technological diffusion to income inequality – must address skill constraints and mismatches affecting the labor market’s ability to adjust.
These factors, together with rent capture and winner-take-all markets, can entrench inequality and blunt markets’ competitiveness.
One hopes that this is the first step toward an integrated approach that addresses the forces impeding technology diffusion, undermining competitiveness, and exacerbating inequality.
But we know one thing: the productivity paradox is real, and it is contributing to rising inequality in many societies.
The Inequality TrifectaLAGUNA BEACH – There were quite a few disconnects at the recently concluded Annual Meetings of the International Monetary Fund and World Bank.
Among the most striking was the disparity between participants’ interest in discussions of inequality and the ongoing lack of a formal action plan for governments to address it.
While inequality has decreased across countries, it has increased within them, in the advanced and developing worlds alike.
Indeed, beyond this trio’s moral, social, and political implications lies a serious economic concern: instead of creating incentives for hard work and innovation, inequality begins to undermine economic dynamism, investment, employment, and prosperity.
Given that affluent households spend a smaller share of their incomes and wealth, greater inequality translates into lower overall consumption, thereby hindering the recovery of economies already burdened by inadequate aggregate demand.
Today’s high levels of inequality also impede the structural reforms needed to boost productivity, while undermining efforts to address residual pockets of excessive indebtedness.
That is why it is so disappointing that, despite heightened awareness of inequality, the IMF/World Bank meetings – a gathering of thousands of policymakers, private-sector participants, and journalists, which included seminars on inequality in advanced countries and developing regions alike – failed to make a consequential impact on the policy agenda.
Policymakers seem convinced that the time is not right for a meaningful initiative to address inequality of income, wealth, and opportunity.
In fact, a number of steps can and should be taken to stem the rise in inequality.
To be sure, such measures will make only a dent in inequality, albeit an important and visible one.
It is time for heightened global attention to inequality to translate into concerted action.
Some initiatives would tackle inequality directly; others would defuse some of the forces that drive it.
Intergenerational inequality also needs to be addressed.
BackNext