Imperialist
in sentence
49 examples of Imperialist in a sentence
We Western people are imperialist, colonialist missionaries, and there are only two ways we deal with people: We either patronize them, or we are paternalistic.
I mean, can you engage in a conversation with that kind of woman without seeming kind of cultural
imperialist?
An interesting thing the movie does not address well is the shift in the Tintin books from the early rightist and
imperialist
books (Tintin in the Congo, Tintin in the lands of the Soviets) to fairly anti-imperialist books just a few years later (The Blue Lotus).
Of all the British
imperialist
movies like Four Feathers, Charge of the Light Brigade for example, this movie stands out as the cream of the crop.
However, Dan Cruikshank has trivialized the history, culture social systems and architecture of these places to present an imperialist, pompous 'search for treasure' -(whatever that is supposed to mean).
After all, his attempts to reform the French economy, public sector, and labor markets – not to mention his perceived elitist pretensions and
imperialist
tendencies – have produced a swift and severe backlash.
Democracy came to be associated with its particular American variant, and took on an
imperialist
connotation.
Moreover, neither oil and gas deposits nor
imperialist
policies will stop Russia’s decline.
Yet the root causes of that failure go deeper, to Iraq’s creation as an artificial entity in the 1920’s by British
imperialist
planners, who stitched together three disparate provinces of the defeated Ottoman Empire into a state that never had a coherent identity.
And two years ago, protesters at the University of Oxford demanded the removal of a sculpture of Cecil Rhodes from Oriel College, where the old
imperialist
had once been a student, because his views on race and empire are now considered to be obnoxious.
The word democracy came to be associated with its particular American variant, and took on an
imperialist
connotation.
Memories of the Sino-Japanese War of 1894-1895 and Japanese aggression in the 1930’s are politically useful and fit within a larger theme of Chinese victimization by
imperialist
forces.
Russia by contrast is a revisionist
imperialist
power, whose lack of self-confidence is returning to haunt the world.
They believe that Russia has inherited a cultural DNA that transcends revolutions, as if some kind of vicious gene was driving the Kremlin’s current
imperialist
aggression in Ukraine (and, if Putin’s threats are to be believed, Kazakhstan may soon be next).
When British statesmen established Iraq as a distinct political entity after the defeat of the Ottoman Empire in World War I, they did so in accordance with their own
imperialist
interests.
Moreover, problematic elections constitute a specific challenge for the West, which is simultaneously the bearer of a universal democratic message and the culprit of an
imperialist
past that undermines that message’s persuasiveness and utility.
Nowadays, Rudyard Kipling’s
imperialist
Great Game is decomposing into a vicious circle.
Its decolonization efforts freed millions from the yoke of
imperialist
oppression.
He understood that Argentines were tired of the Kirchners’ imperious (one might even say authoritarian) political style, whereby anyone who disagreed with them was branded a lackey of dark
imperialist
forces.
Like many modern
imperialist
powers, China claims legitimacy for its policies by pointing to their material benefits.
Politically, Ahmadinejad certainly would not miss the chance to exploit unilateral measures for propaganda purposes – claiming that Iran has a conflict not with the international community, but with
imperialist
states intent on depriving his country of technological progress.
Rather, the world is poised between two models of integration: one is multilateral and internationalist; the other is bilateral and
imperialist.
After the failure of its
imperialist
Greater East Asia Co-Prosperity scheme of the 1930’s (which had a soft-power component of anti-European propaganda) and its defeat in World War II, Japan turned to a strategy that minimized military power and relied on strategic alliance with the US.
Putin is not just a fireman who sets fires; he is an old-school
imperialist.
This August on the 50th anniversary of Japan's defeat in WWII, hard-line Politburo member Liu Huaging invoked memories of "successive and fierce aggression by
imperialist
powers" to insinuate that certain antagonistic countries "will not accept a powerful and prosperous China."
Then on October 1st at a National Day speech in the Great Hall of the People Premier Li Peng defiantly proclaimed that "After shaking off
imperialist
bullying and persecution from various powerful nations, the long suffering Chinese people have been on the rise ever since."
Instead, Xi has chosen to pursue an unabashedly aggressive strategy that has many asking whether China is emerging as a new kind of
imperialist
power.
Thus, if Russia continues along an
imperialist
line, its democracy will be at risk.
It is to avoid this
imperialist
logic that sensible Americans like Henry Kissinger and George Shultz have revived the dream of a nuclear-free world.
The Iraqi state, established in the 1920’s by British
imperialist
planners (with Winston Churchill in the lead), is a strange pastiche of three disparate provinces of the old Ottoman Empire: Mosul in the north with a Kurdish majority, Baghdad in the center with a Sunni Arab majority, and Basra in the south with a Shia Arab majority.
Related words
After
World
Which
Power
However
Democracy
Aggression
Years
Their
Tendencies
Defeat
Whose
Views
Vicious
Variant
Three
Strategy
State
Social
Removal