Example collocations logo

Identity in sentence

1935 examples of Identity in a sentence

But we dance with a consciousness that this is a historic form that can produce silence and produce invisibility across the spectrum of identity that we enjoy today.
This allows us to create a user-controlled portable identity.
Having this kind of portable identity around the physical world and the digital world means we can do all kinds of human trade in a totally new way.
So I've talked about how blockchains can lower our uncertainties about identity and how they change what we mean about transparency in long distances and complex trades, like in a supply chain.
But you use it every day, so I think we're sort of facing the same John Sculley idea of technology should either be invisible or beautiful, and blockchain is kind of neither of those things right now, so it's better suited for either really early adopters who kind of get it and can tinker around or for finding those best use cases like identity or asset tracking or smart contracts that can be used at that level of an enterprise or government.
Here's an example of a site you can go to if you want to change your identity.
Knowing ISIL's desire to destroy modern human lives, it's a natural extension for them to destroy cultural identity as well.
This is ancient identity theft writ large.
We work to protect that good person identity.
They leave us fighting for that good person identity.
So most of the time, nobody's challenging our good person identity, and so we're not thinking too much about the ethical implications of our decisions, and our model shows that we're then spiraling towards less and less ethical behavior most of the time.
On the other hand, somebody might challenge our identity, or, upon reflection, we may be challenging it ourselves.
We perhaps are overestimating how much our self-interest is driving our decisions, and perhaps we don't realize how much our self-view as a good person is affecting our behavior, that in fact, we're working so hard to protect that good person identity, to keep out of that red zone, that we're not actually giving ourselves space to learn from our mistakes and actually be better people.
Andrew Solomon: You've talked a lot about the global versus the national, but increasingly, it seems to me, the world situation is in the hands of identity groups.
Nationalism believes in a single, monolithic identity, and exclusive or at least more extreme versions of nationalism believe in an exclusive loyalty to a single identity.
If you think that there is just a single identity for a person, "I am just X, that's it, I can't be several things, I can be just that," that's the start of the problem.
CA: But is one explanation of what's happened in the last year that a group of people have got fed up with, if you like, the liberal elites, for want of a better term, obsessing over many, many different identities and them feeling, "But what about my identity?
Identity is always problematic, because identity is always based on fictional stories that sooner or later collide with reality.
Build more on this idea of it being compatible with local identity, local communities.
And I found that our sweat is mostly odorless, but it's our bacteria and microbiome that's responsible for your smells, your mood, your identity and so much beyond.
It's how we speak about ourselves, how we understand our identity, how we look at our surroundings, who we find out about each other because of the meaning of our lives.
You can't tell if someone's dealing with a mental illness, or they're struggling with their gender identity, they're caring for an aging parent, they're having financial difficulty.
And that is not traditionally the American identity.
That's traditionally, frankly, the Russian identity.
It's by separating ideas from identity and being genuinely open to persuasion.
And once we're inside this shared reality, debate also requires that we separate ideas from the identity of the person discussing them.
Attacking the identity of the person making the argument is irrelevant, because they didn't choose it.
At this point, they all look the same, they have no separate identity.
Or who, because of their identity, might not be taken entirely seriously if they did.
Our public conversations, even our private disagreements, can be transformed by debating ideas, rather than discussing identity.
BackNext