Example collocations logo

Historical in sentence

2205 examples of Historical in a sentence

A wonderfully done historical biography of the Austrian girl who eventually became the ill-fated queen of France during the French Revolution.
This early Kurosawa film interested me not only as a historical object, but because, as in every one of his films I've seen so far, the moral and philosophical implication of the story carries as much weight as the dramatic and poetic aspects.
A historical note: Although tons of pictures of Vikings with horned helmets have been produced over the years, this is actually a myth.
I love historical costume dramas but I was truly appalled at the soap opera-level of this script.
There were such great historical events taking place at that time, such as mad King Henry's lust for an heir and willingness to plunge his country into a religious war, betrayal of his wife, intrigues of his court, black plague, etc.
The surprising thing when viewed from an historical perspective, is that society's attitudes toward diversity have changed little and gay people are still struggling with the problems presented in this movie.
The movie is quite expensive and has a pretense of being a historical drama, but the plot and the message of it are just way too cheesy.
Aristocrat party prepares a conspiracy and March 15, 44 b.c -Idus of March- Julius Caesar was assassinated in senate .Remains surprisingly true to Shakespeare's adaptation and working directly from the original, unlike many other historical movies of the same era.
The side stories of the characters involved and their individual romances and escapades only solidify the historical significance of the film.
This is an interesting historical relic that is reflective of the era that it came out of.
An overlong, highly episodic excuse for some burlesque and indulgent violence masquerading part-time as a film of historical interest and validity.
There's a lot going on here about Korean hatred of Japan, which is based on historical events.
There was no attempt at establishing the historical context.
Story has nothing with historical facts.
Not only did it not stick to historical facts (which would be understandable since Gregory didn't either), but it also completely changed the plot of the novel.
I believe Clavell was a great historical novelist, and when he tried out the silver screen, with all its limitations, he maintained his integrity.
Based on historical accounts that I've read, this movie is very faithful to details and does not necessarily portray the Earps in the most sympathetic light, though they are definitely the protagonists here.
Impressive styling of the 1940s era and fine direction from Francis Coppola, whose middle name is Ford (ha!), makes TUCKER a historical tribute to the revolutionary, all-too-superior "car of tomorrow" that never was destined to bury the Big Three.
There's no historical atmosphere here -- everything is "soundstage" -- and there's no chemistry between its leading man and leading lady.
though this movie may not be an exact historical time-line of events it was refreshing to see a story that wasn't so one sided, at least in my opinion.
The British TV has a great reputation for historical dramas, but I don't think they'll be able to top 'I, Claudius'.
This can't be considered a historical film.
"Rambo" is a historical masterpiece compared to this thing.
It's a historical film, and over the years hasn't really aged, so it remains fantastic 62 years later.
Just like the title says, Michael Hirst should be banned from doing historical movies.
with 56,000 us soldiers and other killed in Vietnam this is an historical piece what ever your opinion about the war, it is still a tragedy to lose 56,000 to the war.and to this day makes you wonder why?
Today it is hard to find many moviegoers who regards it as more than a historical anachronism, and a plain bad film.
Of course it's Cronenberg's first feature-length film, so it's worth seeing for historical reasons, but the script is boring, monotonous, unfocused and it lacks an engaging protagonist.
What I appreciate is that the revolution, fight for Indian independence, and Hindu-Muslim riots were kept as a backdrop and that the movie didn't sidetrack into a historical film.
It's really only relevant today as an historical snapshot (much like the Australian film JEDDA) - a museum piece, if you will.
BackNext