Example collocations logo

Groups in sentence

3991 examples of Groups in a sentence

But China’s leaders should expect nothing else so long as they maintain a system where lawyers face persecution when they advocate for the weakest groups in its society.
Some groups have gone into voluntary liquidation; others have been suppressed for not complying with regulations; and still others are in exile.
The vendetta against independent groups with foreign ties brings Russia no benefits and damages its international reputation.
This would unlock domestic funding, enabling such groups to operate in Russia.
A multicultural society that accepts every taboo of its diverse groups would have little to talk about.
Instead, they advocate diplomacy “on steroids,” staffed by diplomats trained in new media, cross-cultural communications, granular local knowledge, and networks of contacts with under-represented groups.
The Church of England filmed various Christian groups saying the Lord’s Prayer, one of the foundations of Christian worship.
Many observers are relieved that Russia no longer needs external aid to support groups and activities that previously relied on it.
Such requirements would not prevent useful capital flows: global banking groups could invest equity in emerging markets and fund their subsidiaries’ balance sheets with long-term debt.
Civil-society groups are proposing and implementing useful initiatives.
In this maelstrom, new radical groups with transnational agendas are blossoming.
With no institutions left to ensure a peaceful political transition in these countries, violent groups had an advantage over ordinary citizens, and a crude fight for power ensued.
And without economic security, some young people will resort to illegal activities, or fall prey to extremist groups exploiting their desperation.
Only one Latin American country (Haiti) appears in the group of low HDI countries, while the rest are in the medium and high HDI groups.
Ethiopia’s New Climate of FearVienna – The European Union, the United States, and other major donors will pump about $2.5 billion into Ethiopia this year, a sum that does not even begin to include the cost of medicines, famine relief, and countless other services provided by non-profit groups in one of the world’s most impoverished countries.
Deepening democracy in turn means allowing full civic participation, including non-violent Islamic groups.
These groups have shown their powers when, following the crash of the MMM pyramid, the Ministry of Finance proposed to regulate the Russian securities market through the notoriously corrupt Tax Inspectorate.
When governments and private donors pledge monetary aid, the funds typically pass through a chain of large groups that determine how it will be allocated.
These disadvantaged groups are particularly large in the countries that were hit hardest by the recent global financial crisis and now struggle with high unemployment.
The remaining options are said to fall into three groups: “grand scientific quandaries” (such as uniting gravity and electricity into one theory) which require a huge investment and first world infrastructure; “data collection,” which is the field work associated with archeological digs and biological/genetic surveys; and “science-informed problems,” such as combating AIDS or addressing global warming.
Rather, it increases the prospects of corrupt leakage that may allow terrorist groups access to nuclear weapons.
As the UK-EU negotiations get underway, it is critical that companies bear this in mind, by ring-fencing Brexit working groups and keeping the rest of the firm’s management focused on broader business strategy.
But, because of political pressure exerted by small, powerful interest groups, windfall profits will inevitably be spent at home in unwise subsidies.
Moreover, Iran has managed to separate the nuclear negotiations from broader, related issues like its ballistic-missile program, its support for groups like Hezbollah, and its domestic human-rights record.
But, in addition to communicating with distant audiences by rhetoric and symbols, leaders need the ability to communicate one on one or in small groups.
Nevertheless, the distinction is important and seems lost on the US – and a host of other countries – which have lumped the nationalist groups together with Al-Qaeda and Jemaah Islamiyah (JI) in their lists of terrorist organizations.
Frighteningly, groups like Al Qaeda can claim the mantle of popular nationalism as a means of pursuing their ultimate utopian aims.
Moreover, although Muslim religious and secular leaders are able to isolate millenarian terrorists and undercut their popular support, they lack the moral capital to completely discredit nationalist extremists groups like Hamas and Islamic Jihad, as long as the Muslim laity shares some of their goals.
Ignoring the various dimensions of suicide bombing, and the outlook of the groups responsible, America and its allies have been left helpless to comprehend, much less address, the largely indifferent reaction of many Muslims to the US-led “war on terror.”
By regarding all suicide bombers as irrational fanatics, rather than drawing distinctions between millenarians and nationalists, the US and its allies have ceded crucial political ground to groups like Al Qaeda and JI that insist on the impossibility of negotiating with Islam’s “enemies.”
BackNext