Example collocations logo

Groups in sentence

3991 examples of Groups in a sentence

Both groups of countries achieved great advances in education, health, poverty reduction, and other human development indicators.
Unions and agricultural groups tie up traffic with protests every other day, hinting at possible escalation.
The “third front” involves assorted petty particularisms – parties representing the sectarian interests of specific castes, sub-regions, or linguistic groups.
The danger is that such groups could accentuate the divisions of a fractious society, rather than pull everyone together in the collective national interest.
And firms are making attempts to attract underrepresented groups, including women, young people, minorities, people with disabilities, and migrants.
As it stands, workers, particularly from lower income groups, are slow to respond to demand for new higher-level skills, owing to lags in education and training, labor-market rigidities, and perhaps also geographical factors.
Vested interests prevailed: business groups attempted to capture specific markets, and public-sector workers fought to preserve their privileges.
They no longer join political parties, trade unions, and other interest groups.
However, in the case of Kashmir, the asymmetric conflict currently fought by proxies and terrorist groups might not degenerate into all-out war precisely because India and Pakistan have mutual nuclear deterrence.Indeed, such asymmetric conflicts through proxies have become the new conventional way that states avoid the price of a general war.
Russia and NATO must jointly develop a new security agenda and a more cooperative methodology based on common working groups and joint papers.
Leading the charge are antagonistic forces – from populist political parties to separatist groups to terrorist organizations – whose actions tend to focus more on what they oppose than on what they support.
In Russia and Asia, anti-Western groups are at the forefront of the campaign against globalization.
Despite their differences, these groups have one thing in common: a deep hostility toward international structures and interconnectedness (though, of course, a murderous group like ISIS is in a different category from, say, European populists).
From Twitter trolls sowing discord among voters, to the Kremlin’s alleged support for extremist groups, Russian propaganda is undermining trust in democratic governance.
Like other ISIS-affiliated groups, the so-called Sinai Province publishes its military metrics and reports both monthly and annually.
To accomplish this, it must be in representatives’ self-interest to reconcile their constituents’ diverse interests, rather than represent homogenous groups.
Until recently, something approximating this arrangement prevailed in the European polity, redistributing integration’s gains to produce mutually beneficial outcomes for diverse European groups.
Individual nation-states, regions, and special-interest groups are represented within the EU.
In India, certain historically disadvantaged groups (particularly among the lower castes) are now politically assertive.
The US and Indian examples suggest that, in democratic societies, groups that promote social discrimination grow politically weaker over time.
In India, greater social equality has meant that small numbers of hitherto subordinate social groups have begun to enter the political and economic elite.
These parties enjoyed the support of two of Nigeria’s three main ethnic groups, the Hausa-Fulani, who dominate the north, and the Yoruba, who live in the southwest.
It, too, failed to carry out health care and pension reforms even if resistance at that time came from different interest groups.
But decades of research have shown that inclusion and equality should not mean ignoring differences between underrepresented groups.
The tide of events shifted to favor the opposition and facilitate coordination among its disparate parts, including politicians, business leaders, civil society organizations, active and retired military officials, intellectuals, labor unions and even members of religious groups.
And the student population is just one of many social groups that lives on debt.
With a few hours and a lot of googling, one can learn much about how both countries’ governments have commandeered public media, cracked down on privately owned TV stations and newspapers, weakened constitutional courts, attacked immigrants, promoted hate speech against Jews, Muslims, and other minority groups, and unleashed online trolls.
Their tactic of choice is no longer armed insurgency, as in the 1990’s, or raids by groups of militants, as in the 2000’s, but individual acts of terror.
Companies and special-interest groups will always seek to benefit from the absence of regulation.
Its diversity must be recognized, so that groups that resort to violence can be differentiated from those that do not.
BackNext