Example collocations logo

Goods in sentence

3286 examples of Goods in a sentence

Under this plan, imported goods and services would be taxed at a rate of 20%, while exports would be subtracted from the tax base, and thus not taxed at all.
The proponents of a cash-flow BAT argue that it would merely level the playing field, because most of America’s trading partners refund their value-added tax on exported goods and services.
In this scenario, foreign producers would bear the cost, because they would receive fewer dollars for the goods they sell to the US.
From an economic standpoint, therefore, a better way to “rebalance” the tax system would be to reduce the rate of corporate-income tax, and simultaneously introduce or increase sales taxes on imported and domestically produced goods and services.
Although the United States remains the main destination of Latin American and Caribbean exports, Asia is becoming an increasingly important market for goods based on natural resources.
Even where customs are no obstacle, as between Albania and Macedonia, very few goods are exchanged.
What they do not require is geographical nearness or the physical movement of goods.
This revolution is spreading to the production of goods, where robots and 3D printing are displacing labor.
For physical goods, there are costs associated with logistics and lead times, owing to inventories and poor forecasts of the market.
The world we are entering is one in which the most powerful global flows will be ideas and digital capital, not goods, services, and traditional capital.
Corporations could exist only as long as free individuals willingly purchased their goods – and would go out of business quickly otherwise.
The corporatist model makes no sense to younger generations who grew up using the Internet, the world’s freest market for goods and ideas.
State aid to ailing companies remains ubiquitous, and common rules designed to ensure free circulation of goods and services are not fully respected by the member states - public procurement and energy markets being prime examples.
He then pointed out that a GST is critical to enabling India, like the United States, to reap the benefits of its continent-size domestic market, as it would replace the “stifling hodgepodge of local taxes” that amount to “internal tariffs on the movement of goods.”
Sales taxes vary, and are augmented by “octroi” taxes on cross-border shipments of goods destined for local consumption.
For businesses, particularly those that have to transport goods across the country, the GST would be a boon.
Pandering to BJP governments in Gujarat and Maharashtra, which claimed that, as “producer” states, they would lose out from a GST, Modi revised the bill to grant states the right to levy an additional 1% tax on outgoing goods.
If states were levying individual taxes on top of the GST, the national market would again be divided and distorted, with checkpoints returning on state frontiers to assess the value of the goods on their way out.
It wants to abolish the extra 1% tax levied by the states and bring all kinds of goods within the GST’s ambit.
It can enable companies to charge excessive prices for low-quality goods and unreliable services, while facilitating corruption, abuses of power, and waste.
One popular explanation lies in the fuzzy notion of “secular stagnation”: long-term depressed demand for goods and services is undermining incentives to invest and hire.
As the private sector purchases more of that debt, demand for goods and services falls, creating deflationary pressure.
Demand curves are downward sloping: typically, at higher prices, others will demand less of Americana goods, and a strong dollar means that American goods are more expensive.
The surge in cross-border flows of goods, services, capital, and information produced by technological innovation and market liberalization has made the world’s countries too interconnected, their argument goes, for any country to be able to solve its economic problems on its own.
For example, the World Trade Organization’s Agreement on Application of Sanitary and Phytosanitary Measures (the SPS Agreement) explicitly requires the use of scientific evidence when health concerns are at issue for imported goods.
It is also the world’s top exporter of merchandise and the second-largest exporter of goods and services.
As a result, its exports contain an ever-increasing share of imported goods and services and the share of domestic value-added in its exports per unit of output is rapidly declining.
If we focus only on material wellbeing – on, say, the production of goods, rather than on health, education, and the environment – we become distorted in the same way that these measures are distorted; we become more materialistic.
Moreover, such products – including 86% of US imports from China in computer and electronic products, 63% in electronic equipment and components, and 59% in nonelectrical machinery – usually embody high-value inputs or equipment produced by foreign (often US) companies outside China.This means that the value added to technology goods “produced” in China is considerably less than the value of those exports.
This means that the value added to technology goods “produced” in China is considerably less than the value of those exports.
BackNext