Example collocations logo

Globalization in sentence

2352 examples of Globalization in a sentence

As a result of both technological displacement and technology-enabled globalization, the share of employment in occupations in the middle of the skill distribution has declined rapidly in both the United States and Europe.
They are nostalgic for the past and fearful of globalization.
Populists effectively converted these memories into a political force that rejected efforts leading to globalization and an open society.
Yet there is remarkably little reflection taking place about the state of science today, despite significant challenges, rooted in globalization, the digitization of knowledge, and the growing number of scientists.
And the three trends mentioned above – globalization, digitization of knowledge, and the expanding ranks of scientists – are exacerbating the problem.
As globalization increases competition, it also reinforces certain narratives – such as those dictating which research areas deserve the most funding.
In the “flat world” of globalization – to borrow Thomas Friedman’s powerful metaphor – it seems that Russia no longer has a place.
In a world driven by unstoppable technological progress and relentless globalization, we must consider whether income inequality really matters more than equality of opportunity.
Likewise, globalization and technological progress often disrupt traditional or legacy industries, where older workers are more likely to be employed.
In the United Kingdom, the “Leave” campaign promised vindication for those who have been left behind in the age of globalization.
The zone promises to kick-start a new round of liberalizing reforms and help China’s economy adapt to the latest demands of globalization.
China’s initial globalization “dividend,” accrued through low factor costs, is rapidly diminishing, and a new era – characterized by reliance on the massive domestic market to absorb foreign high-level factors of production, such as technology and human capital – is just beginning.
These are the same kind of voters who turned out for the UK’s Brexit referendum – poorer people who have not felt the gains from globalization.
Many commentators have correctly pointed to the economic effects of globalization to explain anti-immigrant sentiment.
The fact that globalization produces both winners and losers certainly explains much of the anti-globalization backlash now apparent in the UK and elsewhere.
Addressing shortfalls in public services can help to mitigate economic concerns about immigration, and about globalization more generally.
That raises the question of globalization, which entails concerted action on many fronts by the international community.
Trump’s protectionist instincts and hostility to globalization do not bode well for the world as a whole.
But some would argue that beneath the chaos and bluster, there is an economic rationale to the Trump administration’s disorderly retreat from globalization.
US populists, perhaps inspired by the writings of Thomas Piketty, seem unimpressed by the fact that globalization has lifted hundreds of millions of desperately poor people in China and India into the global middle class.
For better or for worse, the globalization train has long since left the station, and the idea that one can turn it back is utterly naive.
In speeches and tweets, Trump has aggressively lashed out against globalization.
While globalization is an important factor in the hollowing out of the middle class, so, too, is automation.
Trump and his team are missing a simple point: twenty-first-century globalization is knowledge-led, not trade-led.
The processes of twenty-first-century globalization are too sudden, unpredictable, and uncontrollable to rely on static measures like tariffs.
Over the last two decades, this situation has changed dramatically: globalization has continued, but the social contract has been torn up.
Individually, they cannot compete with emerging markets; they need a strong EU to face the challenges posed by globalization.
As a result, Arabs have come to view liberalization and globalization negatively.
If the established powers that first benefited from the globalization of trade are known as the G-7, the countries, regions, and organizations that are benefiting from migration – China, India, Kurdistan, Israel, ISIS, Turkey, and Niger – could be called the M-7.
In a quest for economies of scale and a strategic repositioning of facilities in order to survive in a world of fast growing competitive pressures, globalization adds to the process of corporate restructuring, mergers, and acquisitions.
BackNext