Freedom
in sentence
3168 examples of Freedom in a sentence
Similarly, in a country where the concepts of democracy and
freedom
are balanced by “but,” achievements in science, technology, and economy are not possible.
Dictators who demand amnesty as a condition for leaving power are somewhat like airplane highjackers who insist on
freedom
for themselves and imprisoned comrades as the price for releasing hostages.
For starters, people tend to think of taxes as a loathsome infringement on their freedom, as if petty bureaucrats will inevitably squander the increased revenue on useless and ineffective government employees and programs.
Freedom
cannot be absolute, whether online or offline.
Instead of allowing the Internet to result in greater freedom, China’s government constructed a Great Firewall.
It is shameful that a country known for its democratic values and its unparalleled commitment to human
freedom
should stoop so low as to kill innocent men, women, and children.
Freedom
in money creation or in interest-rate policy could mean economic disaster – as, indeed, it did in many ex-colonies following independence.
Yam was always frustrated by the lack of policy
freedom
under the Currency Board.
Following the massacre at the satirical magazine Charlie Hebdo in Paris last month, world leaders dashed to the scene, locked arms, and marched in support of
freedom
of expression as a bedrock principle of civilized societies.
In the Baltic states, people are increasingly worried that geopolitical competition over the Nord Stream 2 gas pipeline linking Russia to Germany will affect writers’
freedom
of speech to opine on Russian President Vladimir Putin’s regime.
Horizontal subsidiarity concerns the responsibility and
freedom
of human beings, as well as social and economic powers.
An example of horizontal subsidiarity is the internal European market, which created a new kind of economic
freedom
and increased competition between firms because they are no longer protected by national governments.
Horizontal subsidiarity means that in both society and the economic sphere, the state cannot violate individual
freedom
and responsibility, which must be respected to the greatest possible extent.
It also means that support must be given by a "superior power" whenever individual
freedom
and responsibility do not suffice to achieve the ends necessary for human dignity.
In the 21st century, Europe must reconsider the value of both principles - solidarity and subsidiarity - if it is to attain integration's historic goal: the
freedom
and well being needed to overcome the differences and political divisions that incited tragedy in the 20th century.
At the global level, public goods – such as a stable climate, financial stability, or
freedom
of the seas – are provided by coalitions led by the largest powers.
Political leaders enjoy fewer degrees of
freedom
before they must respond to events, and must then communicate not only with other governments, but with civil society as well.
Consider Strike Debt, an offshoot of the Occupy movement, which calls itself “a nationwide movement of debt resisters fighting for economic justice and democratic freedom.”
How to do this and maintain
freedom
of enterprise is one of the great unsettled questions of political economy.
This new confrontation, however, is not defined by antagonism between communism and capitalism, but by a dispute over social and political order – a dispute about freedom, democracy, the rule of law and human rights – as well as by a struggle for geopolitical spheres of influence.
They demanded the
freedom
to chase their own dreams.
For instance, no economic cost is too great for the defense of
freedom
of speech.
Many generations of Japanese have walked a single path – that of freedom, human rights, and the rule of law – and we will continue to walk this path for generations to come.
“Thanks to Europe, people enjoy the
freedom
to live, buy, love, and trade across borders.”
But
freedom
and democracy do restrict arbitrariness and theft, and encourage politicians, regardless of their moral qualities, to take public interests into account.
Democracy, in their view, leads to disorder;
freedom
of thought causes popular “confusion”; and public criticism of the Party tends toward the breakdown of authority.
Less official corruption, more trust in the law, and greater
freedom
of thought would make China a more stable, more creative, and even more prosperous society.
Democracy in the sense of free elections within certain rules does not allow the rest of us to say that the cause of
freedom
has prevailed and that we can walk away.
Freedom
of expression facilitates an unproductive cacophony of outrage, so the media must receive clear directives to guide their reporting.
In fact, the main driver of Russia’s modernization was the formation of a new social order based on freedom, diversity, and a recognition that the modern world was rich in opportunities for self-actualization, whether in the arts, business, science, or politics.
Back
Next
Related words
Their
Which
Expression
Democracy
People
Would
Political
Speech
World
About
Press
Other
Economic
Rights
Human
There
Should
Movement
Country
Countries
