Example collocations logo

Feature in sentence

1799 examples of Feature in a sentence

Three Stooges - Have Rocket, Will Travel - 1959 This was the first feature length film to star the Stooges and it is pretty bad.
Though I'd heard that "Cama de Gato" was the worst Brazilian movie of the decade, I watched it giving it a chance; after all, first-time director/producer/writer Alexandre Stockler managed to make his debut feature (shot in video) for just US$ 4,000 and -- though it looks even cheaper -- I can't begin to imagine all he went through to finally get it exhibited in theaters with no big sponsors or production companies behind it (then as I watched it I realized why).
My guess is they finished filming and saw their 35 minute work or art (garbage!) and decided that they'd let the editing crew turn it into an 88 minute feature film.
NBC mini-series (later released to video/DVD as full length feature film) about the treacherous 1960s, as seen through the eyes of both a white family and a black family.
The plot only makes for less than ten minutes of good story, and this is just stretched out painfully until it reached the minimum length for a feature film.
This feature requires nothing more than your barest attention on a Saturday afternoon, a programmer that made whatever else it was paired with better.
It's set in Hawaii, it's an action/adventure crime drama, lots of scenes feature boats and palm trees and polyester fabrics and garish shirts...it even stars the character actor "Zulu" in a supporting role.
It could sustain a 3-4 minute comedy sketch maybe, but this is just not a feature film by any stretch of the imagination.
This was one of many 1983 movies to feature the pop-off-the-screen effects.
Fans of creature feature films have to endure a lot of awful movies lately.
I bought it for $3.99 at a fairly major video retailer in order to do some "indie"" type movie research since I had just finished my own feature and was editing it.
The film is nothing compared to his blockbuster feature films, such as Big Daddy or even the corny Billy Maddison.
I am compelled to write a review of this IMAX feature as a means of warning others to SAVE YOUR MONEY.
If you do wish to see an IMAX feature, I suggest the beautifully photographed "India: Kingdom of the Tiger" or the technically thrilling "Space Station 3D".
If the film I saw in a movie theater was originally released on TV, I would plead with its producers and distributors to not fool a paying audience with the false promise of a cinematically worthy documentary feature.
The characters were stereotypical "white-trash", the movie's "plot" was stunted from the beginning, and the worst feature of this movie was that the nudity was so blatantly from body doubles it was funny.
I purchased one of the seasons of "The Batman" in the hopes that an extra bonus feature could shed some light on the creators' reasoning for making this show such an atrocity.
I want to state first that I am a Christian (and that I do work in the film and TV industry) so I understand what it is like to work on a feature length film so props to the filmmakers in that regard.
The plot is even flimsier than those used in the old days, trying to stretch out two-reel ideas for a feature.
'Home Alone 3' is the first of the Home Alone movies not to feature Culkin in the main role and the same villains.
More than likely you will see it as an extra feature on some cheap "4 movies on 1 DVD" compilation at Wal-Mart for five bucks.
I am aware that this is only a third feature following two other films so of course it wouldn't be as good but I'm sure that more of a contribution wouldn't have hurt the Disney artists who, indeed, have achieved such remarkable styles of animation over the years.
It has the prickly energy of a big commercial feature, but a shapeless style which brings out nothing from the characters except their kooky eccentricities.
The film does feature a couple of beauties.
Whoever in their right mind gave Toby Keith the chance to act in a feature film, is obviously on the same mental level as him.
It is astonishing that this film was ever released it has no redeeming feature and should be avoided at all costs.
I would also like to safely declare that I am probably the only person in the history of the world to do a double feature of this and Hitchcock's VERTIGO.
I felt like the directors were so exited to do that movie (it's their first feature), that they actually never really asked themselves, what story they wanna tell.
In fact, this feeble excuse for a fright feature is so crummy that not even the uncredited starkly staring eyes of the great Bela Lugosi can alleviate the brain-numbing boredom.
As a TV movie it might have been slightly above average, but as a feature film it leaves much to be desired.
BackNext