Example collocations logo

Feasible in sentence

426 examples of Feasible in a sentence

It is neither feasible nor desirable for Europe to establish itself as a geopolitical equal or competitor of the US.
They also recognized that they lacked the power to challenge the US-led security order or offer a feasible alternative.
Until we can find a feasible alternative, reducing reliance on one of them means that another must take its place.
Here, although randomized trials are not feasible, it remains possible to follow evidence-based medicine’s primary rule: to base action on systematic summaries of the highest quality evidence available.
But it is impossible to mitigate all risk, so aiming for this is not feasible.
In the United States, for example, cutting emissions by 80% by 2050 is not only feasible; it would require added outlays of only around 1% of GDP per year.
As JFK showed, great progress begins with a great goal, one that is bold yet feasible.
In fact, a basic income may very well be fiscally feasible – not to mention socially desirable – in places where the poverty threshold is low and existing social safety nets are both threadbare and expensive to administer.
And no feasible basic income would be large enough, at least for now, to enable people simply to leave work behind.
Old models of economic growth, however, such as export orientation and selective use of import restrictions that worked well for East Asia in the last century, are less feasible under today's global trade rules.
No immigration deal is feasible north of the border without addressing security matters; south of the border, there is no conceivable Mexican cooperation on border security or on a Temporary Workers Program if immigration reform ignores the nearly five million Mexican citizens without papers currently living in the US.
Their lethargic performance, together with the eurozone’s, is the main reason why the world economy has not managed the 4.1% growth that optimists like me thought was feasible.
I also expected to hear from business representatives about whether my proposed solutions – greater workplace flexibility, ending the culture of face-time and “time machismo,” and allowing parents who have been out of the workforce or working part-time to compete equally for top jobs once they re-enter – were feasible or utopian.
Such reforms, though feasible, I confess are unlikely.
In today’s world, they must be low enough for us to shake our neighbor’s hand, understand his problems as we do our own, and find feasible solutions.
Using purely digital channels thus makes it feasible to meet the needs of low-income customers.
Ultimately, hyper-human genetic enhancements will become feasible, too, and the economic and social advantages that wealthy countries maintain could be expanded into a genetic advantage.
Yet more is needed and feasible.
As the examples above show, conservation and improved livelihoods for the rural poor are feasible, and even mutually reinforcing.
Progress happens by moving into what the theoretical biologist Stuart Kauffman calls the “adjacent possible,” which implies that the best way to find out what is likely to be feasible in a country is to consider what is already there.
But the best feasible target would be a tiny symbolic surplus for the primary balance (which excludes interest payments on debt) this year, and a gradual increase thereafter to a realistic 1.5-2% of GDP.
But translating prospective goals into actions at the country level will not be feasible without measurable and meaningful indicators to guide policy and measure progress.
Analysis of the Simpson-Bowles and Domenici-Rivlin deficit-reduction plans by the nonpartisan Tax Policy Center confirms that this approach is arithmetically feasible.
But the odds of such an outcome are very low: what is arithmetically feasible is unlikely to be politically possible.
But a large reversal in the fortunes of rich and poor countries seems neither economically likely, nor politically feasible.
For example, the new labor-displacing technologies could make feasible activities for which there had been insufficient skilled labor.
This forces us to return to the question of whether such a reform is politically feasible.
A small surcharge on the existing VAT is the best, and, indeed, the only feasible, solution.
Amending the Constitutional Treaty will not be feasible until 2009.
As a result, the only feasible forms of production use very few low-skilled workers – and thus operate at low productivity.
BackNext