Events
in sentence
3304 examples of Events in a sentence
I couldn't understand why some of the
events
were taking place, and a lot of
events
happened before they were explained, making them sort of confusing.
The sequence of
events
that made sense in the novel were completely tossed about, and Mrs. Smith, Anne's bedridden and impoverished schoolmate is walking around in Bath - - twittering away, as many of the characters seemed to do.
This movie which purports to depict his life should have used a fictional character, because the overdramatized
events
are too strong a departure from the facts and the chronology.
Maybe someone should tell Neal that substituting lyrics of songs which are failing to inspire anyone outside of a dwindling audience isn't the same thing as creating characters who are motivated to speak because of
events
created by the writer or director.
Acting performances are adequate, however, many important
events
that were present in the novel are omitted.
While we're waiting for the cement to dry and the film to figure out what it's about, we're periodically jerked back in time without rhyme or reason so we can watch
events
leading up to the cement thing.
The whole movie creates this sense of
events
about to happen that will be scary and creepy, but then delivers a very simplistic tale of revenge and murder over the loss of some property.
If we keep morality factor aside, even then the bizarre
events
looks trite.
One thing that astonished me about this film (and not in a good way) was that Nathan Stoltzfus, who seems to pride himself on being the major historian on the topic of the Rosenstrasse, was one of the historians working on this film, considering how much of the actual
events
were altered or disregarded.
It is hasty, the story is shaky and the
events
depicted are poorly acted.
The
events
take place in Tromaville, a little town that proudly claims to be the toxic chemical capital of the world, and they certainly aren't lying.
A collection of Deleted scenes and alternative takes, edited together and with added voice-over to make it appear to take place after the
events
of the first.
That was the basic movie, and that same order of
events
happened about 4 or 5 times.
I don't know the reason however if he had difficulty with his voice during production of the movie I think they could have re shot the
events
that did not contain his own voice when he had recovered.
For the knowledgeable Beatles fan, the main value in this movie is to just sit back and pick out the flaws, inaccuracies, combined events, omitted events, wildly exaggerated events, omitted people, timeline errors, mis-attribute quotes, incorrect clothing, out of place songs, and (shame shame) incorrect instruments and other boners I just cant think of right now.
The story is 22 years after the
events
that occured in the first film, Norman Bates is out of an asylum and back to the Bates motel, but when a woman turns up claiming to be his real mother, things start going wrong.
I was hooked - all the mystery, suspense, unexplained
events.
Many events, characters, how the character interact and meet in the book are simply changed or do not occur.
The flow of
events
that in the book are very smooth, are choppy and fed to the view as though you a child.
Whilst mummy and daddy (bland Alexander Knox) entertain their guests at a dinner party, the youngster tries to kill himself, setting in motion a life changing series of
events
that find Bergman spending time showering compassion on the poor and needy.
I've seen rumors on other websites about this movie being based on true events, however you can not find any information about it online...so basically this movie was a waste of time to watch.
It loosely based itself off the
events
in the first Lion King movie.
Common sense approach to
events
that occur.
And though blood sacrifice is given to Kali and Durga, the
events
depicted in this film are just absurd.
It isn't just about a linguistic translation, but certain absurd chains of
events
are skipped entirely, robbing the film of its original clever farcical nature and turning it into a cheap "oops there go my trousers" style of farce.
The latter portion of the film is basically a predictable melange of
events
that maneuver Foxx into Hudson's earlier position and allow her to strut back in and lord it over everyone.
The strongest part of the original story (Les Liasons, not CI) is the characters and their interactions, not the
events
themselves.
Compare to the original, in which Chuck Heston's nakedness metaphorically captured his utter helplessness and astonishment at his turn of
events.
Then all of a sudden you find these two people getting drawn together during a series of
events.
and includes the
events
leading up to and following in the wake of the war.
Back
Next
Related words
Which
About
Their
There
Movie
Recent
Would
People
World
Story
Could
Other
Years
After
Extreme
Should
Weather
Place
Based
Political
