Engagement
in sentence
1123 examples of Engagement in a sentence
Thus, Moon will most likely pursue a two-pronged strategy that pairs denuclearization with
engagement
and preparations for eventual reunification.
Rather than waiting for the politicians to do something about it, South African businesses should deepen their
engagement
with ever-broader segments of the population.
Many Asian countries, through deep and predictable political
engagement
with the US, have grown accustomed to America’s commitment to their security.
Doing so will require genuine, long-term
engagement
on the part of “shareholders,” and pressure from engaged citizens the world over.
America has reduced its involvement, having withdrawn its troops from Iraq and winding down its
engagement
in Afghanistan by next year.
An agreement should also be followed by sustained political
engagement
on other mutually important issues.
Libya’s newfound
engagement
with the US and the EU represents not only a major shift in its international policies and diplomatic posture, but also a major internal reorientation, because the country now wants to develop an economy that is not exclusively based on oil.
The new US commanding general in Afghanistan is reportedly a specialist in “counter-insurgency,” which could well involve surreptitious
engagement
by US operatives in Pakistan.
In the coming years, China’s
engagement
with the developing world will continue to deepen.
Assuming that China’s leaders are aware that their relationship with one of the world’s worst-behaved regimes will not further their goal of global engagement, the US should consider how it could influence Chinese policy.
We seek broader
engagement
based on mutual interest and mutual respect.
One solution is for the African states to evolve a common position and shared rules of
engagement
in the war on terrorism.
But, in some of the world’s hardest-to-reach communities, technology is revolutionizing patients’
engagement
with modern medicine.
Originally conceived by former Premier Zhu Rongji – one of modern China’s most strategy-minded reformers – the CDF quickly became a high-level platform for
engagement
between senior Chinese policymakers and an international lineup of academics, foreign officials, and business leaders.
The Fourth Industrial Revolution will usher in systemic changes that demand collaborative
engagement.
We live in an age of complexity, and sound leadership in the Middle East, as everywhere around the world, calls for a wholesale shift in how we think about collaborative
engagement
for the future.
True autonomy for Japan, as in the past, depends once more on active and cooperative
engagement
in containing a world crisis.
This is part of a broad effort directed by President Barack Obama to deepen our diplomatic, development, economic, security, and cultural
engagement
across the region.
In Southeast Asia, we are expanding our
engagement
with the Association of Southeast Asia Nations (ASEAN), increasing bilateral
engagement
with traditional allies and partners like Thailand, the Philippines, and Singapore, and developing our cooperative partnerships with Vietnam, Malaysia, and Indonesia.
In support of this increased
engagement
– aimed not at establishing new permanent bases, but rather at building stronger allies and partners through a greater rotational presence – the third pillar of America’s rebalancing is to enhance our presence across the Pacific and Indian Oceans.
As local news has declined, civic
engagement
and public trust have waned.
But it also needs effective communication that makes clear to the American people that the relationship with China truly is too big to fail and thus requires a long-term process of thoughtful
engagement.
To ensure a positive outcome, policymakers should develop a fully transparent framework with well-defined “rules of engagement.”
For example, the terms of
engagement
in NATO are likely to be renegotiated.
And, as a bilateral strategy,
engagement
has proved to be astonishingly successful, having led to historic openings, first to Myanmar and now to Cuba, while driving progress toward an enduring nuclear agreement with Iran.
From the beginning, however, the Obama administration has made clear that
engagement
is not an end in itself, but a means to various goals, both bilateral and regional.
Already, Obama’s policy of
engagement
has led to the most bilateral interaction since the Iranian revolution and hostage crisis in 1979.
Whatever America’s Republican Party tries to claim during the 2016 presidential election campaign, Obama’s policy of
engagement
has worked, enabling the US to shape events in even the most closed countries.
Another source of doubt about America’s enduring influence lies in the fact that multilateral
engagement
is still needed, and this is always more difficult than bilateral
engagement.
Bilateral
engagement
will prove to be one of Obama’s most important foreign-policy legacies.
Back
Next
Related words
Their
Which
Political
Economic
Global
Policy
International
Would
Should
Could
Other
There
World
Through
About
Countries
Between
Without
People
Government