Example collocations logo

Employment in sentence

3253 examples of Employment in a sentence

The evidence to date, on the employment and trade fronts, is that the disadvantages may have more than offset the advantages.
Over the past three and a half years, the economy should have created some 4 to 6 million jobs to provide employment for new entrants into the labor force.
There is an important role for government in ensuring full employment - a role that the Bush administration has badly mismanaged.
American and rich country engineers and computer specialists will either have to accept a wage cut and/or they will be forced into unemployment and/or to seek other employment - almost surely at lower wages.
French Socialists support the Constitutional Treaty as a way to strengthen political effectiveness and democratic accountability in the EU, and because it advances the cause of social progress by integrating the Charter of Fundamental Rights and defining goals such as full employment, sustainable development, anti-discrimination, and gender equality.
Manufacturing employment in the US fell in 2003 to its lowest level since 1964, but thanks to a tripling in output per worker, total manufacturing output was roughly three times larger.
Pressure to reduce costs in the recent downturn may have accelerated the movement of jobs to low-wage locations, but this accounts for only 15-35% of the decline in employment since the downturn began.
These new mass markets sustained a steady increase in average incomes and total employment.
Governments need to play a developmental role, with implementation of integrated policies designed to support inclusive output and employment growth, as well as to reduce inequality and promote social justice.
Structural transformations should promote full and productive employment as well as decent work, while governments should have enough policy and fiscal space to enable them to play a proactive role and to provide adequate universal social protection.
At the end of that period, participants would receive soft business-startup loans from European development banks to create employment in their countries of origin.
They assert the right to employment, to education, to health and to social security not as benefits conferred by the state but in their capacity as residents with human rights recognized by the international community and proclaimed in the United Nations' Universal Declaration of Human Rights.
The fact is that our way of life is predicated on security and stability, without which investment withers, employment collapses, and economies shrink.
In the 1990s, employment soared in several industrial countries, again with little or no inflation.
Most business investing leads through non-monetary channels to higher employment – without inflationary over-heating.
Since 1900 at least, there has been a pronounced long-term relationship between share prices and employment in the US and the UK, and over a somewhat later period in France, too.
Statistical evidence shows that the same given change in share prices is followed by a greater change in employment in the more capitalist economies than in the more corporatist ones.
We argued that more responsive economies have fewer employment protections to scare entrepreneurs away from starting new firms, and have less industry-wide or economy-wide wage bargaining, which may also deter entrepreneurs.
We found that the greater the level of capitalisation, the more responsive employment was to share prices.
Many Western nations react to perceived flaws by drawing back somewhat from capitalism through increased public sector employment, public expenditure, and social control over the private sector.
It is plausible – though not a certainty – that an economy dominated by large public expenditure and public employment is capable of greater stability.
It is doubtful that there is a positive benefit – net of future cost – from jiggling tax rates to stabilise employment.
In the United States, for example, the financial sector generates just 4% of employment, but accounts for more than 25% of corporate profits.
And central banks’ efforts to suppress it will carry large costs, in terms of employment and growth, as occurred in the 1980s and 1990s.
It is time to recognize, once and for all, that governments, not central banks, are responsible for generating long-term employment and growth, by ensuring favorable investment conditions, a high-quality education system, and open, competitive markets.
If the financial sector declines, what will replace it in employment terms?
Yet women around the world still face a massive gender gap in employment and wages.
Because men are more likely to perform wage labor or farm cash crops, a climate-driven event like drought may cost them their wages and force them to move to cities to find employment.
However, while these factors may explain some of Scandinavia’s success, the low rate of unemployment and the high level of GDP per capita also have a much more straightforward explanation: the high share of government employment in the labor force.
Indeed, the share of government in employment in Scandinavia is surprising.
BackNext