Example collocations logo

Employment in sentence

3253 examples of Employment in a sentence

By contrast, the US Federal Reserve has a dual mandate: price stability and full employment.
Economic efficiency, investment, and employment would take a significant hit, while slower growth would be accompanied by higher prices, including for basic food items.
This out-of-control debt spiral threatens to flatten the country’s growth trajectory and worsen employment prospects.
This lending squeeze resulted in a sharp drop in GDP and employment, while the sharp sell-off in assets ensured further declines.
This was my point five years ago in renewing the idea of secular stagnation – to suggest that the economy as it was in 2013 required some combination of fiscal expansion and structural change to sustain full employment.
But MGI’s research found that the adoption of AI may not have a significant effect on net employment in the long term.
Extra investment in the sector could contribute 5% to employment by 2030, and the additional wealth created could drive up labor demand, boosting employment by another 12%.
MGI’s models indicate that job profiles characterized by repetitive tasks and little digital knowhow could fall from some 40% of total employment to near 30% by 2030.
The goal is to incentivize employment, and to create an online system that is easier to use.
Rising prices trigger a surge in building activity, which creates job opportunities for young, low-skill workers, whose employment options are otherwise limited, and generates large profits for property developers and builders.
The wage surprise draws its inspiration from the Netherlands, where a consensus emerged in the early 1980’s that in order to sustain employment, the burden of taming rampant inflation should be shared by employers and the employed.
In its push for universal higher education and global status, China is stringing its young people along with the promise of high-paid, meaningful employment after graduation.
By contrast, in most emerging-market economies, fiscal policy was procyclical: government spending increased when the economy was approaching full employment.
These measures will include not just a cap on the number of economic migrants, but also policies leading to expectation of full employment and continuity of income.
On every one of these occasions, the effort triggered processes that reduced employment and output far more than the Fed’s staff had anticipated.
Small and medium-sized firms – the most important sources of innovation and employment growth – will feel the effects most acutely.
This mismatch between skills supplied and demanded represents a serious drag on employment growth.
Rapid output growth without equally rapid capital-stock or employment growth must have reflected rapid productivity growth.
So, even if there are good reasons to expect a period of sub-par investment and employment growth, this need not translate into slow productivity or GDP growth.
Since early 2010, US employment growth has been running well above the natural rate of labor-force growth, with the economy adding more than 15 million private-sector jobs in the longest continuous series of monthly employment increases on record.
Making matters worse, this trend has not extended to employment.
Between 1995 and 2015, the top 100 firms increased their market capitalization fourfold, but did not even double their share of employment.
America’s Risky RecoveryCAMBRIDGE – The United States’ economy is approaching full employment and may already be there.
But America’s favorable employment trend is accompanied by a substantial increase in financial-sector risks, owing to the excessively easy monetary policy that was used to achieve the current economic recovery.
The increase in inflation that usually occurs when the economy reaches such employment levels has been temporarily postponed by the decline in the price of oil and by the 20% rise in the value of the dollar.
The return to full employment reflects the Federal Reserve’s strategy of “unconventional monetary policy” – the combination of massive purchases of long-term assets known as quantitative easing and its promise to keep short-term interest rates close to zero.
That strong growth raised employment and brought the economy to full employment.
It does not, and this is what economists call the “lump of labor fallacy” – the idea that handing out pensions frees up employment for younger people, as if there were a fixed number of jobs to go around.
Even companies catering to the “silver market” (elderly consumers) have barely begun to develop more age-friendly employment practices.
The economy, they argue, is always at full employment.
BackNext