Electricity
in sentence
1569 examples of Electricity in a sentence
But the directive ignores household customers, who in 2001 were able to choose their
electricity
supplier in only five EU States and their gas supplier in only three.
Over the last few months, the two leaders have agreed on a package of confidence-building measures, including two new crossing points along the Green Line that divides the island; improved mobile, radio, and
electricity
connections; and mechanisms for business and cultural cooperation.
Examples of this dynamic include the startups and multinationals that have joined the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation to help find a cure for Ebola and entrepreneurs using solar panels to provide off-grid
electricity
to remote villages in Africa.
Carstens throws in an environmental objection, too, for good measure: the
electricity
used in the process of mining Bitcoin is equivalent to the daily consumption of Singapore.
Many African businesses – nearly half of companies in Nigeria, and more than one-third in Angola and Egypt – highlight unreliable
electricity
supplies as a major challenge.
Second, we must produce
electricity
with wind, solar, nuclear, hydroelectric, geothermal, and other non-carbon energy sources, or by capturing and storing the CO2 produced by fossil fuels (a process known as CCS).
Third, we must switch from fossil fuels to
electricity
(or hydrogen produced by zero-carbon electricity) or in some cases (such as aviation) to advanced biofuels.
In the past decade, the US has reduced its emissions more than any other country, because the fracking revolution has allowed for inexpensive natural gas to replace coal in
electricity
generation, while preventing a price backlash against renewables.
There is also the challenge inherent in wind-generated electricity: ensuring that the city can continue to run when the wind is not blowing.
With a combined output of 360 megawatts, which will feed
electricity
into the grid, these turbines will more than cover Copenhagen’s
electricity
needs – and the surplus can be used to offset the city’s remaining CO2 emissions, including from the city’s millions of non-electric cars.
Even assuming a very large carbon tax, this amounts to a rather paltry $142 million, meaning that the project’s value – $261 million in savings – stems largely from the $1.04 billion saved on
electricity
payments.
While that sounds impressive, it depends on a massive 68% increase in the price of fossil-fuel-produced
electricity
by 2030.
Look at the long-term price trends of coal and gas, which power the vast majority of global
electricity
production.
With many more countries set to tap shale-gas reserves over the next decade, this downward trend will most likely continue, helping to lower the price of
electricity
generation further.
That is why Aurora Energy Research recently projected a significant decline in
electricity
prices for the next three decades.
Even if fossil-fuel-powered
electricity
prices remain constant, Copenhagen’s wind turbines become a net drain.
If Aurora’s forecast proves correct, Copenhagen’s wind project would become a massive failure, costing 50% more than the saved
electricity
is worth.
Denmark’s wind industry is almost completely dependent on taxpayer subsidies, and Danes pay the highest
electricity
rates of any industrialized nation.
Several studies suggest that claims that one-fifth of Denmark’s
electricity
demand is met by wind are an exaggeration, in part because much of the power is produced when there is no demand and must be sold to other countries.
The region is poised to become one of the main suppliers of oil and gas for world energy markets, and its big rivers, if properly managed, have the capacity to provide enough water both for irrigation and for
electricity
exports to China, India, and Russia.
Wind and solar are often presented as alternatives to oil and gas, but they cannot compete with traditional sources for
electricity
generation.
Moreover, while wind and solar technologies generate electricity, the biggest energy demand comes from heating.
In the EU, for example,
electricity
represents only 22% of final energy demand, while heating and cooling represents 45%; transportation accounts for the remaining 33%.
Moreover, had the government not cut taxes and delayed much-needed increases in gasoline and
electricity
prices, average annual inflation would stand at 7.5% – a level not reached in decades.
That is partly because two-thirds of Africans – 621 million people – do not have access to
electricity.
Most of all, it needs much more energy, now: Sub-Saharan Africa as a whole, excluding South Africa, currently generates less
electricity
than Spain.
Yet in many African countries, 80% of primary schools do not have electricity, severely compromising the quality of instruction.
Shortages of
electricity
also cost lives.
They also need to redirect the $21 billion spent in Africa on subsidies for loss-making utilities and
electricity
consumption – which mainly benefit the rich – toward connection subsidies and renewable-energy investments that deliver energy to the poor.
China, for example, has enough wind resources to generate more
electricity
than it currently uses.
Back
Next
Related words
Power
Energy
Water
Which
Solar
Their
People
Access
Could
There
Other
Would
Generation
About
Nuclear
Countries
Renewable
Production
Years
Government