Example collocations logo

Editor in sentence

364 examples of Editor in a sentence

Travolta gives one of his breeziest and most likable performances as Michael, an archangel whose quiet existence at the home of a lonely innkeeper named Pansy (Jean Stapleton) is disrupted when Pansy reports Michael's presence in her home to a "National Enquirer"-like newspaper and the editor (Bob Hoskins) sends reporters (William Hurt, Andie McDowell, Robert Pastorelli) to the motel to check it out.
When her no-nonsense editor, Sydney Greenstreet, insists that she entertain soldier Dennis Morgan, she enlists the aid of her boyfriend to use his farm, and she transports herself and the restaurateur there.
One of Joan Crawford's last performances as the driven successful editor vs. all those young beautiful eager beavers fresh out of the elite Seven Sister Colleges.
Peralta and his excellent editor captured the feeling and atmosphere perfectly, helped in part with some incredible archival footage.
I hope the writer, director, editor, and composer (and let's not forget producer) read this... because their work was truly incredible on this movie.
All the things that I had read about Stuey were portrayed incredibly well by Tony Vidmer (writer, director, producer, editor), Michael Imperioli (incredible job as Stuey), and all the others involved in this.
Also, the editor may or may not have been an alcoholic.
Ed (coincidentally an editor) is hired to cut horror films down to be favorable in Europe (where standards are much more rigorous).
as a former TV editor, I can say this is as authentic as it gets.
We can forgive her jump in position from secretary to editor (hey, it's Hollywood) and a few other flaws.
There's park editor, some cool premade parks, free skate, and there's single session where you skate for 2 minutes and get a score.
Edward G. Robinson plays a ruthless editor of newspaper who resurrects the 20-year old story of a murderess with tragic consequences.
Yes a couple of jokes, no absolutely no unpredictable twists, to be honest the only unpredictable moments are there because both director and editor made some stupid mistakes, it is a shame for them and a waste of time for us.
I'm not sure if this movie was written poorly or if some crazed editor cut the thing to shreds.
This is a depressingly shallow, naive and mostly unfunny look at a wildly improbable relationship between Brooks' psychotic film editor and Harold, his vapid girlfriend.
In sum, the film is little better than a History Channel documentary, with the exception that the filmmaker has a slightly greater sensibility than your average History Channel documentary editor and thus can more artfully arrange the details of Goebbels' life.
It would seem that a film editor cut what might have been the best parts of the film out.
Nearly an hour probably could have been cut off the run time had the editor simply removed the overabundance of scenes dealing with nothing more then the main character wandering around aimlessly.
Anyway, her editor discourages her from working on this lame story.
Director James Goldstone gets freaky with the hyperkinetic visuals and camera-tricks, while editor Edward A. Biery goes wild with the zig-zag cuts.
Is adjustment of the relative sound levels the job of the editor, Julia Wong?
He should have eaten humble pie (if not for his own sake then for the men who died in Kargil), hired one of these brilliant Bollywood directors, hired a real scriptwriter, hired a real editor, hired a musician that wasn't related to him in some way (and who seemed to have listened to some bad version of "Apocalypse Now" on some cheap Indian drug), hired a real professional crew, thrown away all the fireworks and told a real story.
The editor must have been asleep or on drugs its so bad.
In the movie he is an editor.
Originally filmed as THE VENUS FACTORY it too suffered from an auteur more awful than Orson so they re-filmed half of it, got a ruthless TV editor to chop it up and down down to 72 minutes and hey-presto..comedy, tonight!
they obviously didn't have enough coverage on the scenes, or they just had a bad editor, because they consistently jumped the line and used terrible choices while cutting the film.
The most obvious fault to me is that the scenes are laid out like a jumbled, non-related series of 2 minute situation comedy bits (any not very good ones at that), that were stapled together by the editor after an all-nighter at the local watering hole.
Didn't anyone-- the prop master, the DP, the editor, the director-- notice or care that they looked so crummy?
Everybody who wants to be an editor should watch this movie!
4) Editing? - I don't know what the editor was on when he did this film but I want some! - Every scene is between 0.5 and 2 seconds.
BackNext