Editor
in sentence
364 examples of Editor in a sentence
By the time your eyes have moved to the area of interest on the screen and focused appropriately on the spot to be admired the insane
editor
has moved the shot!
Doug Headline can't be accused of not being knowledgable in the genre (He is
editor
of a high-class fantasy imprint, has worked for legendary magazine Starfix.), but why a scenario that uses EVERY cliché in the book (except maybe the Odious Comic relief) ?
We get Swoozie Kurtz as a PR maven who promotes Crisp as a stateside entertainer; Denis O'Hare as the
editor
of a gay periodical who hires Crisp as film reviewer, becomes somewhat alienated from him when he appears indifferent to the passions of 80's AIDS activists, and then returns to the fold as a compassionate friend of the dying octogenarian; Jonathan Tucker (in a fine performance) as a shy, insecure painter of gay-themed canvases who is befriended by Crisp; and finally Cynthia Nixon as performance artist and Woman-About-Bohemia Penny Arcade who, intrigued by Crisp's persona, offers him a spot in her traveling cabaret act.
The
editor
must have been half asleep.
I suspect the
editor
went on vacation halfway through the film because quick, choppy cuts start to appear that only confuse matters rather than elucidate them.
The director of this waste of celluloid specialises in dreadful exploitation films where pretension is all; the previous year he did "Dangerously Close" whose good idea (about gangs getting too much power in school and the school paper
editor
against them) was submerged in a sea of sloppiness, and he would go on to do "Cyborg," Jean Claude Van Damme's worst film ever (no mean feat).
I suppose the
editor
was told "we need at least 90 minutes", cause half of all the scenes could have gone in the bin.
The storyline is fragmented, the
editor
appears not to be able to choose between a Guy Ritchie-style of storytelling and a more straightforward one.
(e.g.- every time the
editor
would cut to a new shot, you'd here the sound change perspective with it).
The plot was completely predictable, the editing was rather limited, I swear the
editor
was even dozing off near the end when he was cutting this movie, and the direction was clouded by bad cinematography.
It could also be an
editor'
s mistake, of course.
At least the movie has a few production values and it apparently had a competent
editor
(unlike the movies that truly are awful).
Far worse is the blatant absence of a skillful or experienced director who maybe took a holiday with the
editor
while the film was being made?
Sam O'Steen, the film
editor
on the superlative suspense flick "Rosemary's Baby" from 1968, here directs a quickie TV-made sequel, one in which Rosemary Woodhouse (Patty Duke Astin, in for Mia Farrow) is shunted off early--and inexplicably--presumably to help flesh out the more ghoulish aspects of this flaccid story about Satan's son on Earth.
It is so badly edited, when I looked in the credits it wasn't to read the
editor'
s name--it was to see if the person actually took the credit!
It's not supposed to have any significance other than getting Ben to loosen up a little, but the direction of the whole scene is wrong-headed, and the outcome is unseen because the idiot
editor
cuts away...or was that all the film he had?
Peter Hunt started out as a very gifted film
editor
and got his first stab at directing when he helmed the James Bond film "On Her Majesty's Secret Service" (considered by many Bond fans to be the best of the series).
I'm not sure what the director and
editor
were thinking when they were editing this poor excuse for a film, but whatever they thought of didn't help this movie, it only hurt it, and it hurt this film badly.
Set in 1945, Skenbart follows a failed Swedish book
editor
who decides to take a non-stop train to Berlin.
Red Skelton does a cute bit with Donna Reed and Margaret O'Brien, but the other comedic bits suffer from an apparent vacuum between the performers and the allegedly-live audience (they're awfully silent until the
editor
cuts to them for exaggerated reaction shots).
The editing is especially awful; it really appears that the
editor
(if there was one)literally picked up pieces of film off the floor and pasted them together.
An
editor
should have said something when he started editing and saw that you couldn't see anything.
As an editor, I would hope that the "editor(s?)" of this "movie" never again be allowed to edit a film, book, or even a post-it note.
Irene Dunne (It Happened one Night, the 1939 version of Love Affair) is Paula Wharton, who goes to live on an army base while her newspaper
editor
husband is in training school.
The movie is about Edward, a obsessive-compulsive, nice guy, who happens to be a film
editor.
Marc had been researching the life of Ramon Barnils (1940-2001), a socialist
editor
who had been a family friend.
Director Jeff Smith (who also served as co-writer, cinematographer and editor) definitely shows his love of under-appreciated 80's horror films with this movie!
First, let me confess that I have not read this particular Balzac novel, so maybe I am directing my cavils unfairly at director and
editor.
The director and/or the
editor
appear to me to have deliberately obscured these questions, which doesn't seem like Balzac, the realist.
In Hong Kong, 1962, the
editor
Chow Mo-wan (Tony Leung Chiu Wai) and his wife, and the secretary Su Li-Zhen Chan (Maggie Cheung) and her husband simultaneously move to an old building.
Back
Next
Related words
Director
Newspaper
Which
About
Movie
Would
There
Story
First
Former
Magazine
Could
Writer
Where
After
Should
Editing
While
Their
Called