Example collocations logo

Editing in sentence

1058 examples of Editing in a sentence

While the editing, albeit pure 70s cinema, was completely tangent, the film itself demonstrated the raw force of truth, giving us a rare (yet fictional) story of the changing of the guard in Harlem, the truth of its streets, and the minds of its criminals.
Stylistically and plot-wise, it's pretty much giallo-by-numbers, with the expected camera and editing flourishes and some fairly good suspense.
The editing was awful.
Despite its fascinating writing and editing credits, this movie emerges as a surprisingly dull little "B"-grader, not only paced with the speed of a snail but full of more empty talk than a bag-pipe.
The plot was muddled and unlogical, the acting was terrible, and the editing was poor.
The story has numerous twists and turns which disguise what's really going on for awhile, although clever editing does give us some hints.
In essence the movie has scene after scene that does nothing but emphasize and embellish hate over and over....someone gets out of line...BANG...someone spits the wrong way.....BANG.....someone talks out of line....BANG...then the end of the movie comes and guess what???? BANG, BANG, BANG, BANG...a bar room shoot 'em up that looks like it was filmed one time without editing..... Some of the saving graces of the film are some of the scenery where the movie was shot, details to the guns for the era, costumes that appear to mirror the times and Ric Dark's performance as Owen...the reckless gun for hire that looks like a cross between Ulysess S .
The film & editing was bad.
One of those rare movies where the acting is good, the editing, direction, filming and pace are all excellent and not over done in any fashion.
The composition and editing and design are pure '70s chop-socky, except without any real kung fu.
If you are distracted by the art house aesthetic and use of cinematic and audio editing techniques and don't agree then I'd like to present the classic horror/slasher/suspense scenario for your consideration.
I got the feeling that some rather heavy-handed editing had occurred, both with the plot and the final production.
Very offensive, dumbing down of American cinema, sloppy editing, terrible lighting, did I mention terrible lighting?
The editing, continuity, and other technical aspects were pretty good.
bad acting, parts of the films are overexposed, there are sound problems and the film editing was laughable.
The acting is wooden, the direction and editing are quite poor as well.
The characters, the crazy ways they kill him, Izo's flawless performance, the music, the editing, the camera angle's everything is special.
The editing and cinematography don't go anywhere you don't expect them to, but they don't really need to.
His excellent direction is aided by extraordinary music, brilliant cinematography, effective editing, fantastic city locations and a very good performance by the ensemble cast.
This is well shot who ever did the editing was solid.
In an attempt to dazzle the audience by interweaving the past with the present using slick editing techniques, the directors weaken the credibility of the story as well as confuse the audience.
It's a shame I didn't heed my own inner alarm system, because I would have saved myself an episode of eye strain from the godawful editing and boredom from the godawful script.
The timing and editing are what I feel make the film work.
The screenplay ,directing and editing are all first rate.And if you pay attention, you can learn a lot about the inner workings of our government's congressional/lobbyist bedfellows and the scary fallibility of our justice system and its judges and lawyers.
The movie is made on the scale of a classic, but it falls short of the mark because it needs crisper editing.
Even the special effects and visuals are poor and the editing is totally disjointed.
The editing was horrid, the dialogue was horrid, and the music montages were too often.
More careful editing might have saved the day on a fine film.
Too many jump cuts and editing tricks.
The acting is horrible and it's like the editing department was staffed by the actors--every scene lingers on way too long, letting the viewer watch the actors stare uncomfortably (or cluelessly) at each other (or at nothing)--so they could squeeze out a little bit more screen time.
Back