Editing
in sentence
1058 examples of Editing in a sentence
The choppy
editing?
The film attempts to be "dreamlike", whereas in fact it's merely conceptionless collage of those shots that made it to the
editing
(and believe me, the standards weren't too high to start with).
The plot sucked, the acting was bad, the
editing
was inept and this movie makes me want to poke my eyes out.
Other commenter's here have remarked on the
editing
and apparent seamless use of archive footage.
The
editing
was pathetic.
Gray has his actors linger over every tired line and John Carter's lazy
editing
refuses to pick up the slack, choosing instead to keep his camera trained on the performers' bemused faces.
The
editing
is abrupt and patchy.
The film
editing
is a joke, my teenager could do better.
The use of a fisheye lens throughout and choppy
editing
did not give me a sense of being in the world of the meth head, but it did make me think I was watching MTV for a few short moments.
After being hugely entertained by Mr. Brosnan's performance as a cad in "The Tailor of Panama" (which I rate 10/10 across the board: casting, acting, script, story, editing, pace, music, emotional impact, etc.), I enthusiastically anticipated this film.
The
editing
is bad, the music is annoying, the effects are laughable, almost everything is bad about this.
The
editing
appears again to be an attempt to duplicate the previous classics but is occasionally disjointed and cause more problems for me technically.
Meanwhile the DOP must have been the gaffer from Neighbours, there seemed to be absolutely no sound design, the script, the direction and
editing
were all abysmal, and quite frankly the apathy that overwhelms me right now means that I can't be bothered to spend any more of my life thinking about this film.
The main actor was really good but the
editing
around his moments takes you out of it.
Unfortunately the quality of the camera work and
editing
is verging on the appalling!
As usual for grindhouse flicks of era, there's a fair amount of undressing and dressing for no reason complemented by lousy music, annoying narration, and awkward
editing.
Third on the list you will notice that the musical
editing
is horrible, and they try to cram many songs into this movie, at 30 second intervals... also all digital
editing
is done on said freshman's home PC... probably using windows movie maker.
The trouble is that the technical quality (sets, lighting, sound, editing, you name it) is so God-awful, the movie is intolerable.
The guys at Mystery Science Theater 3000 would love this! Check out the hysterical scene at the end where Pia has a nervous breakdown and all the cheesy
editing
and effects they do to try and show how badly Pia's character is freaking out.
I was interested to see the move thinking that it might be a diamond in the rough, but the only thing I found was bad writing, horrible directing (the shot sequences do not flow) even though the director might say that that is what he is going for, it looks very uninspired and immature) the
editing
could have been done by anyone with 2 VCRs and the stock was low budget video.
for whatever reasons, the film was given to the main distributors who
editing
out half the original film, and then edited in (should i say "shuffled?")
The
editing
was equally bad.. I'll just stop now.. its all bad 2/10
The visual style is very flat and dull, although there is some really nice
editing
once in a while.
Quickly though the movie becomes a mess with uninteresting plotlines, characters that are never fleshed out and nobody in the audience cared for (like Marjoke) and terrible
editing.
The
editing
is ridiculous, the cinematography was random at best, every single syllable of dialogue was completely retarded and the directing ... well, was there even a director there?
Artistically it had its moments with few dreamlike visuals, but some kinetic
editing
and cheap jolts don't help.
Does it really take that much film to show someone actually shoot and make a basket, as opposed to cutting away and
editing
a ball swishing through a basket?
The comedic might of Pryor and Gleason couldn't save this dog from the tissue-thin plot, weak script, dismal acting, and laughable continuity in
editing
this mess together.
No
editing
to speak of.
The picture is balky with turgid sequences, a wobbly narrative and confusing
editing
(always slanted to point up the artistic excesses).
Back
Next
Related words
Acting
Movie
Direction
Music
Story
Cinematography
There
Script
Camera
Great
Really
About
Which
Could
Sound
Would
Writing
Scenes
Terrible
Photography