Example collocations logo

Editing in sentence

1058 examples of Editing in a sentence

I can't stand when Hollywood spends millions of dollars on flash bang equipment and uses fancy editing and cool music, and does not bother to have a plot that hangs together at even the most basic level.
Mad Magazine may have a lot of crazy people working for it...but obviously someone there had some common sense when the powers-that-be disowned this waste of celluloid...the editing is el crapo, the plot is incredibly thin and stupid...and the only reason it gets a two out of ten is that Stacy Nelkin takes off some of her clothes and we get a nice chest shot...I never thought I would feel sorry for Ralph Macchio making the decision to be in this thing, but I do...and I REALLY feel bad for Ron Leibman and Tom Poston, gifted actors who never should have shown up in this piece of...film...at least Mr. Leibman had the cajones to refuse to have his name put anywhere on the movie...and he comes out ahead...there are actually copies of this thing with Mad's beginning sequence still on it...if you can locate one, grab it cuz it is probably worth something...it's the only thing about this movie that's worth anything...and a note to the folks at IMDb.com...there is no way to spoil this movie for anyone...the makers spoiled it by themselves...
The editing is the worst ever, the sound effects were awful and the sound editing was whacked.
The pace was painfully slow, almost all characters were stereotyped, the intertwined editing made understanding the logic very difficult, but, as Steve Rhodes wrote in his review, in the end you don't care.
The actors do their best and are appealing, but this is not enough to overcome all the glaring faults of poor writing, editing and lack of focus.
Okay, the story makes no sense, the characters lack any dimensionally, the best dialogue is ad-libs about the low quality of movie, the cinematography is dismal, and only editing saves a bit of the muddle, but Sam" Peckinpah directed the film.
This is a total thrash in terms of acting, directing, sound editing, soundtrack...
The editing is HORRIBLE and there's stupid-silly overdubs by The Committee (a late 60's neo-avante-garde comedy troupe that mercifully faded off the map within a couple of years).
Could it be: The confusing storyline, the incomprehensible dialogue said by Oliver Martinez, and the annoying editing?
Its a good family movie; however, if Michael Landon Jr.'s editing team did a better job of editing, the movie would be much better.
But, if another one is made, I beg them to take better care at editing.
It had a few unintentionally funny scenes but had a few real good camera shots and editing.
There's a lot of scrambling around, but the direction and editing were so shoddy and choppy, it was like watching outtakes or deleted scenes.
The host of the aforementioned show, a silly little man who spouts drivel while prancing around the stage in dresses, was almost as painfully distracting as the attempts at artful editing.
There were so many goofs, mess-ups, and bad editing that an old episode of Sesame Street would have been better to watch.
This movie fails on so many levels: editing, writing, photography angles, style, lighting, script - name any aspect of this film - it was BAD - probably the food from the caterer was bad too.
Hard to follow, strange editing, disjointed storyline, the characters mumble, all in all a dreadfully dull waste of time.
Bad acting, bad music, bad screenplay, bad editing, bad direction and a bad idea.
But the film-making process, given the preplanning, actual shooting and then editing took a lot of time and their goal had no provisions for actually relating to the Beales as human beings.
From beginning to end, it's filled with bad acting and even worse direction and editing.
My guess is they finished filming and saw their 35 minute work or art (garbage!) and decided that they'd let the editing crew turn it into an 88 minute feature film.
By far the worst editing since "Manos Hands of fate".
So if you wanna see a movie with Poor editing, poor acting, and confusing storyline than be my guest but don't say you weren't warned.
Mrs.Akhras spoke only Arabic which received sometimes a TRANSLATION, sometimes TRANSLITERATION, always awkward, and very suspect for a supposedly objective movie.They also "sweated" her under the lights, while Mrs. Levy sat in (air conditioned) comfort.Rotten editing for Mrs. Akhras' segments too.
The editing tries too hard to look good, and does nothing but confuse the viewer whilst also supplying him/her with a powerful headache.
Everything that can be wrong with any kind of film is wrong here, from the casting and acting to the editing and music.
The editing is glacial and the pacing stalls.
The editing and direction are worse than pedestrian.
It has interesting camera shots, lighting, music, editing, all of which give it the feel of an important movie.
I bought it for $3.99 at a fairly major video retailer in order to do some "indie"" type movie research since I had just finished my own feature and was editing it.
BackNext