Discussion
in sentence
1277 examples of Discussion in a sentence
I think that in the end, this technology will be used for human genome engineering, but I think to do that without careful consideration and
discussion
of the risks and potential complications would not be responsible.
Do you think that your
discussion
may serve as a blueprint for other fields?
Files appeared on the network, including classified documents leaked from the parliamentary investigation commission, which highlights that the free exchange and
discussion
of vital information is starting to become difficult, even for members of a parliament.
Love is always up for
discussion
and, sure, under construction.
There's also a long tradition of attempting to discern the value of sadness, and in that discussion, you'll find a strong argument that sadness is not only an inevitable part of life but an essential one.
BG: Despite all this, and despite the aggressiveness of the discussion, you seem to be remaining quite pro-European.
DM: Well, I think that that's completely legitimate, and I think that we're already having that
discussion.
And the causality requires a moment of
discussion.
So, Tod and I entered into a
discussion
following the Tewksbury work and it was really about how Dan is an expressive person, and he's an intelligent and creative person.
The observations in May of 2009 were the first they spotted, and they started talking about this in the
discussion
forums.
I religiously followed all these restrictive customs for 13 years, until a
discussion
with my partner, Tuhin, changed my perception about menstruation forever.
I had the opportunity to have a
discussion
with President Mbeki, and one of the things that we talked about is, what is it that's keeping this connectivity goal from moving ahead faster?
"Forbidding
" discussion
among employees of salary received.
So, for example, earlier today there was
discussion
of, how do you really lower sexual transmission of HIV?
What they would do is they would explain what was going on and then dictate information that the professor would transcribe onto the many motorized blackboards in the front of the class, and then we'd have a
discussion.
And if we humans are such a vital part of that change, I think it's important that we can feel the
discussion.
And it sparked an enormous
discussion
online, on social media, which was largely dominated by people having fun with their misconceptions, which is something that I couldn't have hoped for any better, in some respects.
There's definitely a public conversation happening now, and like a lot of people, we're heartened that there's less retreating from this difficult but important
discussion.
And yet their voices are sorely underrepresented in this
discussion.
I also believe that this is a particularly appropriate moment to have this
discussion.
And that gave them the opportunity to compassionately sit down with him and have a very difficult discussion, which basically amounted to, "Hey, we know you're sincere, and what that means is, you do hear something in your head."
We knew the
discussion
wasn't over, just paused for a time to bring us back to an even keel.
If we truly want young people to engage safely, ethically, and yes, enjoyably, it's time to have open honest
discussion
about what happens after "yes," and that includes breaking the biggest taboo of all and talking to young people about women's capacity for and entitlement to sexual pleasure.
To me, that is what is essential in this entire discussion, because when you have followers of somebody who don't really care if he tells the truth or not, that can be very dangerous.
All attributes that we want in our bosses, colleagues,
discussion
partners, decision-makers, all virtues that we would like to claim for ourselves.
BG: Those are strong suggestions and your call for individual responsibility is very strong as well, but I'm troubled by one thought, and it's this: you mentioned, and these are your words, "extraordinary Western leadership" which led 60-something years ago to the whole
discussion
about human rights, to the conventions on refugees, etc. etc.
I will frame this conversation in the context of the United States, but this
discussion
applies virtually to any country facing increasing inequality.
It's pretty unremarkable and would be unworthy of discussion, except that the researchers found that if you feed it to mice, it vaccinates against PTSD.
Naturally, people had different opinions on the matter and how we were approaching the
discussion.
And somewhere along the line, we decided we didn't want to have any topic be off limits for discussion, even if those topics pushed us way outside of our friendship comfort zone.
Back
Next
Related words
About
There
Which
Would
Their
Should
Could
Public
Other
Global
Between
People
Countries
Under
Issues
After
Policy
Serious
Economic
Debate