Example collocations logo

Developed in sentence

3415 examples of Developed in a sentence

Recap: Doctor Markov has developed a new theory how to produce energy, knowledge that might unbalance the world.
Meanwhile, Tucci's 'straight guy', the emphatic doctor Seger, is not developed into a more interesting character, like the fallible 'straight guys' Cuddy and Wilson.
( his acting skills lack everything! ) Sascha is played very well by Joanna Pacula, but she needed more lines than she was given, her character needed to be developed.
There are fewer siblings, which should mean that those there are get developed more, but they have less personality than the least featured of those of the first two films.
This very ordinary film is an action/drama with a weak plot; stereotypical, poorly developed characters; and a one dimensional performance by Lowe.
At that point, whatever credence the filmmakers had developed evaporated faster than the highly localized rain in their film.
The characters were not well developed and the storyline jumps around so much that I found myself asking the question "How did we get here?"
Although the topics presented in the film are interesting and relevant, the story was simply not properly developed.
There probably are two potentially interesting films here neither of which are well developed.
And don't let him out until he's developed a decent script for something, anything.
The main villain was a joke and his character was poorly developed.
The plot has a writer returning to Paris after a long trip abroad during which he developed jungle fear during which he had blackouts.
While every now and then one will come across some maverick who will praise the film on philosophical grounds (aggressive feminism or the courage to tackle the issue of transgenderism), the film has not developed a cult following like some notorious flops do.
Wynona and Antonio's characters could have been developed a lot more and their romance could have been much more passionate.
Taken to the nearest hospital it doesn't look good for poor Eddie so his uncle Eddie convinces his brother Richard to let him save Eddie with the serum he has developed, a serum which will give the recipient the power to self heal any sort of wound or illness.
The plot is poorly developed, and the characterisation made it difficult to distinguish between who was who and the part they were playing.
And we certainly don't need a poor, second rate, badly scripted, badly developed and badly piece of rubbish like this.
As a result, there is not a single character who is developed enough for the audience to form any sort of attachment.
Essentially this film is about 3 social outcasts (transexual prostitute, male hustler, and Russian,gay immigrant) who somehow have developed a bond.
there are things thrown in for no apparent reason, characters, half-formed story lines.... the characters weren't well developed at ALL. the ending was.. bad.
The characters are about as well developed as those in a kindergarten "Learn to Read" book.
Also it developed as somewhat of a variety show with lame guest stars including the Olson Twins.
The characters were not developed at all, and there was no real cohesion in the plot which just seemed to go nowhere much.
I felt no sympathy for anyone because their characters were not developed enough.
He has developed a machine that he can use to make an object like a wrist watch or rodent disappear, only to have that object re-materialize in a different location.
Instead we were forced to watch fictitious characters that never developed into anyone we cared about.
I'm sure that there are many gay men who are just happy to see themselves depicted on screen, since Black gay characters are seldom seen, and when they are the characters are usually not fully developed.
The supporting cast are all far more likeable and interesting, but are unfortunately never developed.
Over several years of looking for half-decent films to rent for my kids, I've developed a sixth-sense for spotting the really cheesy, direct-to-video efforts that are really painful to sit through (for anyone over the age of eight).
Not only is the acting terrible, but the plot is never even close to developed.
BackNext