Example collocations logo

Decision in sentence

3429 examples of Decision in a sentence

Moreover, Trump seems to have arrived at his decision almost out of the blue.
It turns out that Trump’s decision was taken against the advice – indeed, over the objections – of not just his chief economic adviser, Gary Cohn, but also his national security adviser, General H.R. McMaster, his treasury secretary, Steven Mnuchin, and his defense secretary, James Mattis.
But, while that did not occur, European principles certainly have not lost their allure, as recent protests in Ukraine, triggered by President Viktor Yanukovych’s decision to shun closer ties with Europe, have shown.
This decision is made more necessary because Georgia's economy is, at last, growing again.
And, in the case of the lawsuits implicating economic policy, no final decision has been reached, despite their being on the docket for years.
Group dynamics prevent company boards that consist solely of males from including women, even if members individually would support such a decision.
Fortunately, this logic has been widely accepted, as demonstrated by the decision that the European Council’s next president, despite being from a country (Poland) that is not yet in the eurozone, will nonetheless preside over eurozone summits.
This principle of solidarity was missing when the decision to build a Baltic Sea pipeline to directly link Russia and Germany was taken.
Forcing Ozawa to step down with him can perhaps be said to be Hatoyama’s only meaningful decision as prime minister, for Ozawa’s departure from the political scene – if it sticks – is the far more important event.
In contrast to the aggressive business lobbying against Trump’s election promises, no major British companies have tried to protect their interests by campaigning to reverse the Brexit decision.
If encouraging voters to think again about the biggest political decision of their lifetimes continues to be treated as an affront to democracy, the UK will lose its only safeguard against permanent self-harm.
This provides some insight into OPEC’s decision last November not to curtail supply.
It is because of the importance of education in making me an exception that I am so deeply troubled by a recent decision of the European Court of Human Rights.
Its decision reverberates across the Continent – not just for the Roma, but for all who have a stake in promoting the values of tolerance and equality in a democratic Europe.
Anyone who believes in the rights of all children to quality education should be troubled by a decision so myopic.
The Court’s decision allows this brutal and systematic violation of fundamental rights to continue.
Because a decision by a second adult to work could eliminate eligibility, the program discourages employment and reduces earned incomes.
When South Africa’s Constitutional Court ended capital punishment in 1995, opponents of the decision argued that the court was not in tune with public opinion; some even called for a referendum.
The decision by the majority of Central European women to decline state protection and accept competition is more important than determining whether or not women are proportionately represented on the boards of large banks or whether they fly in economy or business class.
Another feature of a responsible approach would be a commitment by scientists to evaluate each proposed gene drive intervention – say, immunizing mice so that they cannot transmit Lyme disease to ticks – individually, rather than making a blanket decision on the technology as a whole.
Brexit and the Special RelationshipNEW YORK – The decision whether to remain part of the European Union is obviously one for the British people and their elected representatives to make.
So let me exercise my right as an outsider with a stake in what happens to express a clear opinion: From my perspective (and that of many other Americans), a decision by the United Kingdom to exit the EU would be undesirable – indeed, highly undesirable.
A British decision to sue for divorce would add to centrifugal forces already in evidence.
A decision by the British people to leave the EU would also put the question of Scotland’s independence squarely back on the agenda.
Finally, Great Britain’s decision about its relationship with the EU will not happen in a vacuum.
The US Supreme Court’s 2013 decision that naturally occurring genes cannot be patented has provided a test of whether patents stimulate research and innovation, as advocates claim, or impede it, by restricting access to knowledge.
South Africa’s potential decision to enable access to medicine may be an important milestone on the road toward that goal.
He does not charge ahead; before making a decision, he listens to different opinions and lets emotions cool.
In 2007, the Supreme Court issued a 5-4 decision, siding with the states; and in 2009, the EPA concluded that certain greenhouse gases endanger public welfare.
That decision represents yet another setback for IMF reforms aimed at increasing the influence of emerging economies.
BackNext