Example collocations logo

Decision in sentence

3429 examples of Decision in a sentence

Its rationale for doing so highlights the risks associated with its decision.
Equally important, however, is the fact that the IMF made its decision while facing an existential crisis.
Kessler added that the investigators were “truly certain” that illicit requests for a bribe had been made in exchange for changing a decision, and that Dalli’s name was used.
Given China’s rising economic and military power, this was a smart decision.
How Europe Should Respond to Trump’s Steel TariffsBRUSSELS – The last-minute decision by US President Donald Trump’s administration to delay imposing steel (and aluminum) tariffs on Canada, the European Union, and Mexico for 30 more days will ostensibly give the US a chance to negotiate a longer-term arrangement with its trading partners.
Everybody is nowadays for or against something; everyday many people - often successfully - organize protests to thwart the aspirations of someone or other, or to negate some state decision.
Nor is it simply the result of Sarkozy’s decision to bring France closer to the United States, a move that will culminate symbolically with France’s likely return to the integrated military body of NATO in April 2009.
The problem with the reform, however, lay in the decision to divert one-third of the compulsory pension contributions from the PAYG pillar to create a funded component of the system.
Given that industrial policy broadly refers to any government decision, regulation, or law that encourages ongoing activity or investment in an industry, this should come as no surprise.
But experience shows that the decision to retire or to work fewer hours is influenced by the compensation that members of this group receive.
The enthroning of free capital mobility – especially of the short-term kind – as a policy norm by the European Union, the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development, and the IMF was arguably the most fateful decision for the global economy in recent decades.
But a society’s decision to waive punishment for human rights violators is not necessarily a sign that its moral awareness remains stunted.
Trump’s War of ChoiceTEL AVIV – President Donald Trump’s decision to withdraw the United States from the 2015 nuclear deal with Iran was not his first departure from a key international agreement.
In fact, support for Trump in Israel reached a record high after his decision to withdraw from the JCPOA, and following Israel’s massive military strike against Iranian targets in Syria.
It is, in fact, unlikely that feminism played any role in President George W. Bush’s decision to take the United States to war.
But if they knew that Hitler’s Germany would get it, they might have approved Franklin Roosevelt’s decision to develop it before the Nazis.
For example, rather than viewing monetary authorities’ activism as an encouraging sign of policy effectiveness, markets have been alarmed by the Bank of Japan’s decision to follow the European Central Bank in taking policy rates even deeper into negative territory.
In each case, however, a substantial portion of the decision making should be entrusted to specialized authorities of the region, with the proviso that the aid will be given on condition that they cooperate.
His decision surprised some of his teammates but won applause from many cricket fans.
They loathe it for its “surrender” in Ukraine to the “Orange Revolution,” and they condemn the decision to give land along Siberia’s Amur River to China.
This is what inspired the decision taken in May to create the European Financial Stability Facility (EFSF), by which assistance can be provided, jointly with the International Monetary Fund, to partner countries in times of crisis.
She is now spearheading an attack on Israeli democracy’s last frontier, the Supreme Court, condemning it for rulings such as last April’s decision holding that Israel’s natural-gas policy was unconstitutional.
This was followed by the June 2001 court decision to set a date for trial, making it possible at last to present the evidence against these individuals.
The significance of this decision cannot be overemphasized.
Indeed, the decision demonstrates the BRICS’ ability and willingness to work together, for their own benefit and for that of the entire world.
But, while America’s economic woes and hyper-polarized political climate have undoubtedly contributed to the decision to favor controversial trade deals over international financial institutions that the US created and nurtured, what is really driving the policy shift are fundamental geopolitical changes.
Moreover, one would be hard pressed to identify any meaningful hit to the US from the decision by another major agency, Standard & Poor’s, to downgrade America’s sovereign rating in August 2011.
The European Central Bank was critical of that decision, whose dramatic consequences have exceeded our greatest fears.
That may be a stretch, but concerns that May’s decision to vacate the political center could represent a long-term reversal of Britain’s political moderation are very real.
Breaking Burma’s IsolationNEW YORK – The Obama administration’s decision to seek a new way forward in United States-Burma relations recognizes that decades of trying to isolate Burma (Myanmar) in order to change the behavior of its government have achieved little.
BackNext