Example collocations logo

Decision in sentence

3429 examples of Decision in a sentence

What is true of the agreement is also true of the decision, as part of that agreement, to maintain unemployment insurance benefits for the long-term unemployed.
That is why a recent decision by the European Parliament to back my report calling for the mobilization of private capital in the fight against global poverty is so important.
Given that the European Union is one of the biggest providers of development aid, the decision could be highly significant.
After all, China’s decision to bypass the main international financial institutions, which were created in the aftermath of World War II, has been driven by the refusal of the developed countries that lead them to give it a role commensurate with its economic might.
In addition to moral considerations, the decision to intervene was motivated by concerns about the future of European-American relations, and of NATO after the cold war.
Few could have foreseen how far-reaching that decision would prove to be.
The judges then denied our request for a postponement of the court decision until Mr. Winata's perjury case was resolved.
Tempo's case could become a landmark victory for our democracy, like the US Supreme Court's famous decision in The New York Times v. Sullivan .
By raising the bar for defamation charges, that decision ensures that American journalists can hold public officials accountable.
Supreme Court justices who themselves were frequently wined and dined by corporate donors gave the green light to keep these corrupt flows secret in their infamous Citizens United decision.
A recent revision of that decision permits banks to repossess homes, but only if they help arrange alternative lower-cost housing – an administrative nightmare for lenders, particularly if a lot of people start defaulting at the same time.
There can be no doubt that Daoud’s decision to write the article took extraordinary courage.
Indeed, Jang Sung-taek’s promotion to General was her decision.
This did not produce a joint benefit; it was a bad decision, and one that Obama should renounce.
The July 2009 decision by the Non-Aligned Movement (comprising 118 member states) to hold its next meeting in Tehran provides a powerful demonstration of non-Western perceptions about Iran.
That the US welcomed the steps taken so far was indicated by the Clinton administration's decision to actually implement its previously announced intention to lift trade sanctions on North Korean exports.
For example, the decision to join such an alliance – or even to implement an agreement that allows a foreign country to base its troops on Ukrainian soil – could require the approval of a qualified majority of, say, two-thirds of voters or regional legislatures.
While this is hardly his first – nor even the first time he has been given the boot – there are questions now about whether this will hurt his political ambitions, which many believe were the main motivation behind his decision to act as a leader of the campaign to withdraw the UK from the European Union.
Simply put, if firms find it more profitable to close a job or a plant even after paying the social costs of their decision, then it does not make sense to keep that job or plant open.
At the same time, the judicial process is such that judges have a substantial say in deciding whether a layoff decision is justified.
Judges should make sure that rules are followed, but if a firm is willing to satisfy administrative requirements, pay the layoff tax, and make severance payments, they should not be able to second guess the firm's decision.
With these words, posted online, Gillian Bennett, an 85-year-old New Zealander living in Canada, began her explanation of her decision to end her life.
Her husband, Jonathan Bennett, a retired philosophy professor, and her children supported her decision, but she refused to allow them to assist her suicide in any way, as doing so would have exposed them to the risk of a 14-year prison sentence.
That makes it hard to deny that her decision was both rational and ethical.
Bennett’s decision was also ethical because, as the reference to “the country’s money” suggests, she was not thinking only of herself.
She chose to die nonetheless, because she could have lost control over her decision if she had delayed it.
The decision was likely driven, at least partly, by how difficult it is, given the EU’s porous internal borders, to determine where a refugee first entered.
And, because Arunachal Pradesh is a state of the Indian union, what happens there is India’s decision alone.
But congressional Republicans’ decision to scrap the SEC rule, which Trump quickly signed into law, was an act of pure cynicism that helps perpetuate the “corrupt” system that Trump claims he ran against.
This decision came two years after the company acceded to pressure from environmentalists and scrapped plans to drill in a World Heritage site in Bangladesh.
BackNext