Example collocations logo

Dangers in sentence

704 examples of Dangers in a sentence

According to the Asset Owners Disclosure Project, which I chair, the top 500 global asset owners are alarmingly exposed to the dangers of climate change.
More than half of their investments are in industries exposed to the dangers of climate change; less than 2% are in low-carbon intensive industries.
Building codes already guard against dangers like fire and earthquakes.
This poses dangers for non-HIV patients as well, especially those with suppressed immune systems, young children, and infants.
Though Fischer recognized the perils of free-flowing capital, he argued that the solution was not to maintain capital controls, but to undertake the reforms required to mitigate the dangers.
When Fighting Fake News Aids CensorshipWASHINGTON, DC – Many media analysts have rightly identified the dangers posed by “fake news,” but often overlook what the phenomenon means for journalists themselves.
If Iran did this, it would not only add to the dangers in an unstable region, but would likely begin a process of unravelling the non-proliferation regime worldwide.
But that approach has created new dangers, particularly given the EU’s own fragility, and is unlikely to succeed.
A rat's amygdala responds to natural dangers (rats fear cats without having to learn to do so) and learns about new dangers (sounds, sights and smells that occur in anticipation of cats and other threats).
The ECB’s hawks, understanding the dangers of abnormally low interest rates for a central bank whose primary objective is price stability, had been eager to start raising rates earlier.
They did not see the dangers that were so evident to all of us working in villages around the country.
This otherwise successful minority group must not become mired in the consequences of an unhealthy diet, especially at a time when the majority of the population is more aware than ever of the dangers.
Of course, there is no denying the dangers associated with a military intervention: regional expansion of the conflict, the deaths of many more innocent people, and the strengthening of extremist forces among the rebels, to name only a few.
They need to convey to the US President and the US public that America can indeed be proud of what it has achieved and that a war against Iraq would, moreover, throw away the immense advantage of having demonstrated that international inspections can effectively reduce the dangers of proliferation.
But, to circumvent the restrictions in the state-dominated financial system, a shadow banking system has developed, raising new risks: economic distortions; reliance on excess leverage to drive growth in the consumer, real estate, corporate, and government sectors; and dangers associated with inadequate regulation.
Exiles are not the only ones to recognize the dangers lurking behind this devaluation of speech and renunciation of dialogue.
Attempting to reduce greenhouse-gas emissions through nuclear energy, thereby fueling the dangers of the ultimate global incendiary – nuclear war – could be the most tragic of all miscalculations.
A government that buys political risk insurance by placing an ever-growing stock of reserve assets in dollar securities guards against some dangers.
The Geneva II conference offers an opportunity to address these dangers.
But perhaps most compelling are the dangers of maintaining the status quo.
Iraq provides numerous examples of the dangers created by misplaced priorities.
Yet such agreements pose great dangers if they are not subject to effective WTO oversight.
But the 2008 crisis exposed the dangers, with the globalized financial system’s intricate web of connections becoming a conduit for contagion.
Indeed, he regularly put forth ideas- on the dangers of globalization, on the need for global responsibility, on his vision of Europe as a federation of states and regions- before other political leaders dared to do so.
The financial crisis of 2008 and the threats from insurgency and terrorism in 2014 are seen as “clear and present dangers” to one and all – and both have drawn a global response.
Officials seem worried that a larger public role might undermine financial discipline; in other words, like the advanced economies before 2008, they assume that dangers to efficiency and stability result solely from an overactive state.
The same dangers arise for monetary policy.
But insufficiently strong policies have left dangers lurking beneath the surface.
Given dangers that seemingly grow by the day, it is worth pondering what we may be in for.
In both cases, the particular dangers posed by today’s right-wing populism are underrated or ignored.
BackNext