Copyright
in sentence
137 examples of Copyright in a sentence
So the point is the Republicans here recognize that there's a certain need of ownership, a respect for ownership, the respect we should give the creator, the remixer, the owner, the property owner, the
copyright
owner of this extraordinarily powerful stuff, and not a generation of sharecroppers.
These tools that we built enable this sharing in parts through licenses that make it clear and a freedom to create without requiring permission first because the permission has already been granted and a respect for the creator because it builds upon a
copyright
the creator has licensed freely.
Whether you're an artist, a technologist, a lawyer or a fan, the handling of
copyright
directly impacts your life.
I have been an avid horror fan for about 15 years now, although I never got around to the cannibal subgenre until a few weeks ago, and I guess I owe my short-lived interest in these groan-inducing movies, strangely enough, to China's total disregard for
copyright
laws.
The flashbacks are mostly mundane and predictable, dully acted and with a soundtrack that could put The Laughing Cow out of business it was so cheesy, it actually sounded like muzak or
copyright
free elevator stuff!!! To be avoided at all costs unless you need something to watch with granny of a Sunday evening.
what the exact legal loophole was (the wording of a
copyright
notice) that permitted the books' unauthorized publication in the U.S. (Speaking of which: I take strong exception to the film's dismissal of the covers on that edition as "irrelevant" and "psychedelic," which they were not.
Incredibly, there were 16 "Black Emanuelle" films in total, with the heroine even having the spelling of her name changed to avoid
copyright
issues!!
The cover has Tori Wells and three other "80's" porn stars, and has a
copyright
of 1986.
As long as you keep in mind that the production of this movie was a
copyright
ploy, and not intended as a serious release, it is actually surprising how not absolutely horrible it is.
Also confusing is the fact that 1994 is given as the
copyright
dates on both films.
Seriously, folks...I was getting ready to actually write the Razzie Council and recommend this movie as Razzie Champ for 2007...until I got on IMDb.com and realized its
copyright
date was 2006 and not 2007.
Maybe there's a
copyright
where you have to pay to use certain words?
Therefore it was a joy to find out that True Movies own the
copyright
and were showing it on their channels.
Though, the WDR once told me if I paid DM 200.00 to check the
copyright
(non-reimbursable), and then DM 8 per minute of copying, plus the cost for the materials, then they will consider preparing a (single!) copy for me.
Maybe if enough people will write in, the
copyright
holder will get a clue.
It was in the little TV magazine that they distributed at the PX (not really an authorized edition of "TV Guide" but made to resemble it as closely as possible without getting into
copyright
trouble) that I first learned the real story behind the cancellation.
The
copyright
at the end indicates 1983.
I don't know if there have been different releases and updates, but the disks we rented had a 2000
copyright
on them, if that means anything.
There must be some commercial or
copyright
reason why this movie is not available.
As for the crew having some charactistical resemblence with the crew from Nautilius in Nadia, it might be the artwork but I don't sense any
copyright
infringement there as the character's personalities were perfectly original to me.
What mistake did the BBC make about
copyright
that meant that this version could not be seen in the UK on either video or DVD for many years?
The film carries a 1970 copyright, and I'd bet the 1972 release date on the IMDb is incorrect.
Actually
copyright
1989, which is important: not just because this is exactly the kind of film that sits around for four years before it gets released, but because it means that this South African production was completed before, not after, Mandela got out of prison.
And not be bound by the narrow mindedness of the
copyright
owners and we could watch it till we wore out our VCR's or DVD players.
PS: The RIAA tries to teach us about
copyright?
And to make matters worse... the DVD copy they are selling is a Black and White, 16mm bootleg print, that they somehow got copyrighted.. or at least they claim to hold the
copyright.
The
copyright
owner has gone out of business / has not had any licensing offers and is not prepared to reprint and market on their own.
Obviously as doing so would have involved a lawsuit for
copyright
infringement.
Charles Schulz requested (though since he did not hold the
copyright
to Peanuts he could not demand) that no one create any new Peanuts stories after his death.
If you want to get a more realistic view of Miss Holliday's life read "Wishing on the Moon" by Donald Clarke.Her early recordings are available (now out of copyright) on a multitude of labels,generally the only difference being the packaging.Listen to the freshness and innocence of "I wished on the moon" and forget that this terrible film was ever made.
Back
Related words
Protection
There
Which
Books
Their
Could
About
Years
Patent
Would
Other
Something
Property
Print
People
Industry
Actually
Works
Where
Number