Example collocations logo

Cooperation in sentence

3172 examples of Cooperation in a sentence

Bilaterally, such cooperation might involve an investment treaty, a joint intelligence task force on terrorism, a cyber-security protocol, agreed measures for managing unplanned military incidents, and mutual ratification of the Comprehensive Nuclear Test-Ban Treaty.
But we must hope that in the years ahead we hear less talk of “primacy” and “dominance” and much more about cooperation and collaboration.
But even those differences may not pose an insurmountable obstacle to cooperation.
Yet cooperation within the SCO remains focused on national rather than collective objectives, because its members’ interests vary so much.
The group’s other members – led by China and Kazakhstan – want to strengthen their already robust levels of economic cooperation with the West.
It makes sense for the West, particularly the European Union, to seek cooperation with the SCO, as this would also help counter Russia’s attempts to use it as a tool for its anti-Western policies.
These may look like negative reasons for the EU to engage with the SCO, but there are also ample positive reasons for encouraging cooperation.
Given China’s importance in both military and economic matters, growing energy and trade relations between Central Asia and the West, and the reasonable assumption that Central Asia’s security will continue to have great significance for Western security, cooperation between the SCO, the EU, and NATO looks inevitable.
Consideration also needs to be given, therefore, to the establishment of a NATO-China Council, along the lines of the NATO-Russia Council, and to the creation of arrangements that would facilitate greater cooperation with the SCO as a whole.
Such cooperation would not bridge the main differences between SCO members and the West over issues like democratization and human rights.
If security cooperation is to be a success, politically sensitive issues should be avoided, with the emphasis squarely on practical measures.
Brazil has used its stature to advance peace and cooperation in South America and beyond.
Having visited every South American country in my tenure as Defense Minister, I am convinced that, the most effective deterrent on the continent is cooperation.
At the same time, Brazil is pursuing increased bilateral defense cooperation with African partners.
Finally, we need international cooperation in bad and good times alike.
But Nato, while it remains important for practical military cooperation among its members and as strategic reassurance against any major outside threat, inevitably is becoming less central to American as well as European concerns since such major threats are simply not on the horizon.
There are indeed serious economic issues which could be better addressed through European-American cooperation.
Yet neither the countries of Western Europe nor the United States are ready, willing or able to commit themselves to such cooperation.
Internationa1 cooperation which depends solely on the good will of governments is constantly exposed to the pressures of the moment, to domestic political calculations, to moods and tactics.
Only institutions give predictability to cooperation, they create the mutual confidence necessary for working together, they establish a vested interest in joint success and put pressure on bureaucracies to deliver.
If these ties are not strengthened soon through new institutional links, the Nato bridge, the only US-European institutional arrangement devoted to Atlantic cooperation, will also becorneshaky.
Instead, negotiators must aim to spread the benefits of trade more widely, by taking better advantage of the opportunities for cooperation stemming from geographical proximity, complementary labor markets, demographic dynamics, and economic integration.
Obama has sought, with some success, to marshal a multinational coalition to confront the Islamic State; most important, he has induced cooperation from countries in the region that, afraid to speak and act clearly, had hoped that putting their heads in the sand would make the threat go away.
That means redistributing some of the economic benefits of free movement to communities bearing the burden of it; strengthening control of external borders and cooperation against terrorism; ensuring greater flexibility for eurozone integration and migration; and returning to the idea that EU institutions’ highest calling is to defend Europe’s nation-states, not to develop their own power.
But public subsidies to “national champions” may prove to be as destabilizing for the climate of international cooperation as tariff barriers were in the past.
As the world watches the US presidential candidates wrestle with issues of protectionism, immigration, global public health, climate change, and international cooperation, we should ask what aspect of American identities they are appealing to and whether they are educating followers about broader meanings.
Membership in the new BRICS grouping, many believed, did not provide a strong enough basis for cooperation.
This points to the broader value of international cooperation.
Only the cooperation of free and equal nations can bring this about.
Only such equal cooperation can secure the solid political basis for integration.
BackNext