Example collocations logo

Consensus in sentence

1479 examples of Consensus in a sentence

So it's natural to think that more consensus is a good thing.
Although we may strive for harmony and consensus, in many situations, error and disagreement should be naturally expected.
The consensus amongst economists is that free trade, the movement of capital, the movement of people across borders benefit everyone on aggregate.
The consensus amongst international relations scholars is that globalization brings interdependence, which brings cooperation and peace.
And so gradual consensus is becoming that language can shape thought, but it tends to be in rather darling, obscure psychological flutters.
Otherwise, we only share the consensus; we don't challenge anyone's thinking.
But is there any path whereby we can start to get some kind of consensus, to believe the same things?
We are constantly told that conflict is bad that compromise is good; that conflict is bad but consensus is good; that conflict is bad and collaboration is good.
Practice consensus building.
It's a question that's been tossed around by philosophers and art critics for decades, with no consensus in sight.
In order to be an effective investor, one has to bet against the consensus and be right.
And it's not easy to bet against the consensus and be right.
One has to bet against the consensus and be right because the consensus is built into the price.
And in order to be an entrepreneur, a successful entrepreneur, one has to bet against the consensus and be right.
But if our politicians can't agree on things like health care or even school lunches, I just don't see a path where they'll find consensus on something as big and as expensive as universal basic life income.
But we must acknowledge that this moment has brought about a rare consensus of assumptions.
And that provides the ground for a type of action, because consensus of each moment allows us to act.
And it is necessary, no matter how fragile or how provisional our consensus, to be able to move forward.
Otherwise we will be missing this open moment in history, where we have a consensus on both the form of politics and the form of economics.
Scientists, theologians, and philosophers have been trying to get to the bottom of this question for centuries— without reaching any consensus.
The guilt that the Clinton administration expressed, that Bill Clinton expressed over Rwanda, created a space in our society for a consensus that Rwanda was bad and wrong and we wish we had done more, and that is something that the movement has taken advantage of.
Now, the exact figures here, we should take with a big grain of salt, but there seems to be a consensus that the risk is substantial.
We discovered that averaging the answers of the groups after they reached consensus was much more accurate than averaging all the individual opinions before debate.
And they were given two minutes to debate and try to come to a consensus.
What distinguished the groups that reached a consensus from those that didn't?
And we discovered that the groups that include highly confident grays are much more likely to reach consensus.
Now, when groups reach consensus, how do they do so?
Groups gave much less weight to the outliers, and instead, the consensus turned out to be a robust average of the individual answers.
It happened without us giving them any hint on how to reach consensus.
But we shouldn't kid ourselves and think that we're going to reach a consensus about these things.
BackNext