Consensus
in sentence
1479 examples of Consensus in a sentence
And so instead of giving orders, you're now building
consensus
and you're building a sense of shared purpose.
And in time, my views went from controversial to more or less
consensus
today.
So in fact, experimental economists had run this test around the world, and for much higher stakes, and the
consensus
view was that the measure from the first person to the second was a measure of trust, and the transfer from the second person back to the first measured trustworthiness.
What we've found about the role of religion in law and the role of religion in society is that there's no female
consensus.
The broad
consensus
in neuroscience is that we can't yet diagnose mental illness from a single brain scan.
Oscar buzz, doing great at the box office, a
consensus
idea of what a quality Hollywood film is.
And it won't surprise any of you that, of course, as scientists, we don't have a
consensus.
But there's no hope in the present political climate that we will see U.S. energy policy or international treaties that reflect that
consensus.
But fortunately, the
consensus
was, "Look, this is a problem in a lot of places.
And a
consensus
developed between all of us who were guiding people in that area that that herd was in fact moving slower to accommodate that elephant.
These are hacks, and if we looked at the general shape of the approaches to hacking life there are, current consensus, six kingdoms.
I can appreciate that there is estimation risk in this, but since this is based on widespread scientific consensus, the odds that it's not completely wrong are better than the odds that our house will burn down or we'll get in a car accident.
At the same time, they've insisted on standards and regulation, which has led to fast
consensus
and therefore, fast adoption.
We used to have
consensus
in the United States around contraceptives, and so we got back to that global consensus, and actually raised 2.6 billion dollars around exactly this issue for women.
So I consulted biomechanics experts to find out how much slower it is to run on cinders than synthetic tracks, and their
consensus
that it's one and a half percent slower.
And there's no
consensus.
So finally that brings us to one more idea: If scientists judge evidence collectively, this has led historians to focus on the question of consensus, and to say that at the end of the day, what science is, what scientific knowledge is, is the
consensus
of the scientific experts who through this process of organized scrutiny, collective scrutiny, have judged the evidence and come to a conclusion about it, either yea or nay.
So we can think of scientific knowledge as a
consensus
of experts.
But, we also must admit that we haven't been good at using those same networks and technologies to successfully articulate an alternative to what we're seeing and find the
consensus
and build the alliances that are needed to make it happen.
It's about reaching a
consensus
as much as finding a proper way of channeling our disagreement.
These three elements— beliefs, trusted sources, and values— may seem like a simple formula for finding agreement and
consensus.
Based on thousands of user votes, then we are able to see where
consensus
emerges.
Because, you see, the kind of work that went into organizing all those daunting, tedious logistical tasks did not just take care of those tasks, they also created the kind of organization that could think together collectively and make hard decisions together, create
consensus
and innovate, and maybe even more crucially, keep going together through differences.
But movements today have to move beyond participation at great scale very fast and figure out how to think together collectively, develop strong policy proposals, create consensus, figure out the political steps and relate them to leverage, because all these good intentions and bravery and sacrifice by itself are not going to be enough.
However, after five decades of research, there's no strong
consensus
on the definition, the cause, the treatment, or even the existence of PMS.
It may not be possible to come up with a
consensus
point of view, but I think we should at least understand what all the issues are as we go forward.
The euphoria faded, we failed to build consensus, and the political struggle led to intense polarization.
Their hypotheses are widely varied and lack significant
consensus.
Now, the
consensus
is that the amount of water we need to imbibe depends largely on our weight and environment.
After all, much of our society relies on majority vote and consensus, whether it's politics, business, or entertainment.
Next
Related words
There
Political
Global
About
Which
Among
Would
Broad
Economic
Should
International
Policy
Their
Countries
Growth
Reach
Around
Government
While
Emerging