Example collocations logo

Concerns in sentence

2610 examples of Concerns in a sentence

American journalists also know that the government classifies information mostly to spare it embarrassment, or for expediency, rather than because it has genuine national-security concerns.
The first concerns the term likely to be used to frame the debate: competitiveness.
Of course, embryo research involves legitimate moral concerns, and it is the British who subjected these concerns to the earliest and the most sustained examination.
And yet, as worries have mounted that commercial surrogacy leads to human trafficking and the exploitation of women, India’s authorities have concluded that the ethical concerns outweigh the economic benefits.
Since the launch of the Barcelona Process in 1995, EU Mediterranean policy has been criticized for not linking financial aid to democratic reform, and for giving priority to European concerns like immigration, security, and cooperation on counter-terrorism.
In Nixon’s time, there were solid adversarial Democratic majorities in both houses of Congress, and there were also some Republicans, especially in the Senate, who put concerns about the Constitution ahead of concerns for their party.
Even as the EU and NATO move to support Ukraine, they must also work to address Russia’s concerns.
Developing nations will need to be more understanding and responsive to legitimate concerns in rich countries, and be more willing to pay for some global public goods.
It will not do much for good for developing countries to raise the specter of protectionism each time such concerns are voiced.
The concerns expressed by some observers, such as George Soros, that the eurozone will remain a two-tier club, in which the creditors impose their conditions on the debtors, thus seem exaggerated.
One set of fears concerns the labor market – the so-called “Polish plumber” question.
That outcome should moderate Europe’s inflation concerns.
Third, a Democratic administration has said it will put climate change at the forefront of its global policy concerns.
If the focus is about mitigating carbon production through technological means, there will be few concerns.
According to the 2017 Edelman Trust Barometer, the public’s confidence in the status quo has collapsed worldwide, owing to widely held concerns about globalization, innovation, immigration, the erosion of social values, and corruption.
If they think they can allay public concerns simply by explaining the benefits of the current global economic system and tweaking policies to compensate those left behind, they are in for a rude awakening.
What is new is that repeating these claims, without also addressing people’s deeper concerns, can now do more harm than good.
To address the public’s concerns requires a three-part agenda.
Instead, world leaders must leave their echo chamber, take ordinary people’s concerns seriously, diversify their views, and think about why so many have lost faith in the system.
And, by ensuring that the cost of hiring a foreign worker was high enough to eliminate an employer’s incentive to forego an equally qualified domestic candidate, reversible bonds would eliminate concerns about labor displacement.
The outflows also reflect concerns about China’s economic prospects, including mounting financial risks, as well as fears among some wealthy Chinese that they may be targeted by President Xi Jinping’s anti-corruption drive.
But, it is equally unacceptable for any state to act as if the security concerns of countries in its neighborhood are quantite negligeable: Russia’s security concerns definitely do not belong to the negligeable category.
It suggests a framework for reducing emissions that respects the development needs of China’s households, addresses US firms’ competitiveness concerns, and adheres to the principle of “common but differentiated responsibilities” embedded in international negotiations.
The G-20 in London was responsive to the concerns and special circumstances of the developing world, which resulted in some big thinking.
Perhaps the best illustration of how security and strategic concerns have superseded religious conflict is the shift in relations between Arab Sunni states – including the Gulf monarchies and Egypt – and Israel.
By contrast, India’s most important national security concerns – the unsettled border between the two countries, and Beijing’s ties with Pakistan, which often operates as a Chinese surrogate – are closely connected to China: Both factors are directly linked to China’s perceived threat to India’s Himalayan territory and its rapid development of strategic infrastructure in that region.
India’s concerns also focus on China’s ongoing supply of arms, including missiles and nuclear weapons technology, to Pakistan.
The Liberal Democratic Party (LDP) elite always reacts to the popular mood and concerns – often stealing its opponents’ ideas.
Of course, Pakistan’s concerns about Afghanistan are fuelled by a near-paranoid anxiety about India.
Here, India bears a grave responsibility: it must assuage Pakistan’s valid security concerns convincingly.
BackNext