Compete
in sentence
926 examples of Compete in a sentence
In other words, markets are increasingly geared toward a winner-take-all game: multiple corporations can compete, but to the victor go the spoils.
Instead, they invented the idea of shared sovereignty – the system of federalism that allows for multiple levels of government and for local, state, regional, and national loyalties to coincide, rather than
compete.
As long as no politicians or parties offer programs that
compete
for votes in Germany and in Greece, in Finland and in France, and across the European continent, future crises are inevitable.
Also, private companies
compete.
So there is no conflict of interest with the poorest workers in developing nations because they do not
compete
for the same types of jobs.
He had argued that prevailing economic conditions implied that wider budget deficits would result in higher interest rates and a stronger dollar, making it harder for US manufacturers to
compete
with imports.
Globalization hurt lower-skill workers in places like the United States, as it enabled people from faraway countries to
compete
for the leg-and-finger positions in the global division of labor.
Funded by the European Commission, NuGO gives scientists from organizations that usually
compete
for funding and the best researchers their first real opportunity to work together.
After almost a century of oppression, the Orthodox Church is still struggling to define its role in Russia's postcommunist society, and finds it difficult to
compete
with more nimble (and self-assured) churches.
Individually, the far smaller cities in England’s north cannot really
compete
with that.
Nor is this straitjacket of regulations the best way to equip free market economies to
compete
if parts of it are not implemented by existing member states themselves.
Currently, Apple and Google hold a duopoly on smartphone operating systems, yet they
compete
vigorously to improve their features and roll out new products.
With a clear commitment to the low-carbon industrial revolution, businesses around the world, large or small, can
compete
with confidence, invest with certainty, and drive the scale and innovation necessary to make the changes we need to make.
They compete, expand, mature, and eventually, with few exceptions, fade into obscurity.
Countries
compete
for investment, talent, growth, and opportunity in a globalized world, and those that are pushed out of the running surrender the greatest prize of all: human development, prosperity, and happiness for their people.
How do we equip our countries to compete, not only today, but in the coming decades as well?
Global cities
compete
to provide an ideal life and work environment for innovators, and to harness their creativity to become stronger and more competitive still.
And we are investing in computers and other advanced learning tools to ensure that our children can
compete
internationally.
Access to higher education is a basic prerequisite for economic success, and we need to ensure that Britain can
compete
with the likes of the US and South Korea, which send a much higher proportion of their young people to university.
China’s three leading tech platforms – Baidu, Alibaba, and Tencent – have grown to the point that they are beginning to
compete
with US-based global tech giants such as Amazon, Apple, Facebook, Google, and Netflix.
Indian firms like Infosys and Wipro, giants in the information-technology sector, are now looking for cutting-edge services and high-grade talent as they
compete
for local markets such as the US.
But, for the emerging and developing economies that dominated global growth over the last five years, it raises an important question: Now, with high-income countries joining them, is business as usual good enough to
compete?
But, in order to take advantage of them, countries, like athletes, must put in the work needed to
compete
successfully – through sound domestic policies that foster a business-friendly pro-competition environment, an attractive foreign-trade regime, and a healthy financial sector.
For example, powerful groups and transnational corporations (such as the World Economic Forum, General Electric, and Rio Tinto) are gaining influence within the G-20, the G-7, and the BRICS, whose members
compete
among themselves for access to resources and markets.
That decision remains controversial in France, including among Socialists, but Hollande is well aware of the weaknesses of a European defense policy that simply cannot
compete
with NATO.
To that end, it must balance its imports and exports, while leveling the playing field for foreign corporations operating within its market by eliminating the incentives for local governments to
compete
for FDI regardless of cost, or to engage in other forms of undue intervention.
Capturing the most media attention has been Europe’s eroding credibility, with its paralyzed institutional response to the ongoing financial crisis making ever more fanciful the notion of a “G-3” world, in which the European Union could
compete
as a political and economic equal with the United States and China.
For one thing, such concentrated economic power makes it more difficult for countries to industrialize, because local companies cannot expect to
compete
with established multinationals.
Such rhetoric usually displays a centralist bias, with the pursuit of “more Europe” depicted as the only way that the European Union can
compete
economically with politically centralized countries like the United States and China.
Yet renminbi-denominated finance is nowhere near ready to
compete
with – let alone rival – dollar finance.
Back
Next
Related words
Their
Countries
Other
Which
Would
Could
Global
Companies
Markets
Against
People
Firms
World
Cannot
Economy
Market
Workers
Where
Country
Power