Clunker
in sentence
55 examples of Clunker in a sentence
This is a movie-as-literature clunker, in the same vein as John Huston's 'Moby Dick.'
The only good thing about this
clunker
is cameo appearances by a Who's Who cast of character actors.
Even talented and charismatic Mike Dytri can't save this
clunker.
Man, does this extremely cheap and crummy
clunker
strike out something rotten in every conceivable department: Sisworo Guatama Putra's flat, fumbling (mis)direction, the poky pace, Imam Tantowi's by-the-numbers hackneyed and predictable cookie cutter script, the slipshod editing, the bland acting, Lee Fioole's sub-par cinematography, the dreadful dubbing, precious little nudity, several poorly staged action scenes (in one especially unimpressive scene a native feebly wrestles with a python), the mild gore, Gatot Sudarto's mostly insipid, only sporadically lively score, a pitifully dumb and nonexplicit attempted rape that's followed by an equally lousy off-screen castration, and the colorless, unappealing main characters (Rita in particular is insufferably whiny) all leave a great deal to be desired.
If you have insomnia and are wary about taking prescription medications, then this
CLUNKER
of film should do the trick!
It is a
clunker
beyond belief.
But I'd rather watch a fun horror flick with bad actors than a
clunker
like this with decent actors.
one is really bad,i thought it would be like the classic b movie the undertaker and his pals but it lacks the style and humor of that film,the concept for this
clunker
is a greedy nutty business man uses human flesh grinded in a big meat grinder to make expensive cat food.which
Well, I think I've said enough, avoid this
clunker
at any cost.
Face it, if they would have put 2 seconds of thought into this
clunker
it would have been huge.
Wellman's picture was a gritty, artistic masterpiece, while this
clunker
is nothing more than a stock gangster film with barely a good quality to speak of.
Ignore the way this old
clunker
is marketed on DVD and disregard the American title, "Chamber of Horrors."
However, if you ignore that warning and continue to watch, all sort of evils will escape from this Pandora's box: a machine that allegedly blows up but only showers sparks like a sparkler; hand-held camera shots with that home-movie look; a cliche villain/capitalist; the cliche battle between the scientist sexes; a brief earthquake scene of a city (looks like a postcard) wherein one tall building starts to crumble like a jigsaw puzzle; an odd puffy-faced (like he just had his wisdom teeth removed) twenty-something Whil Wheaton making a joke about his ex-wife...This is no modern "Crack in the world," no hidden diamond in the rough but a depressing
clunker.
This movie is a complete clunker, and was quite frankly boring.
With this movie I have finally decided I'm too old to finish movies that start off as poorly as this
clunker.
That's the best line from this backwoods
clunker
filled with terrible sound, music, and "actors" who seem to be just a group of friends who took a week of acting classes and said, hey we can make a movie now!
Usually when a movie is a
clunker
the audience starts fidgeting and becomes restless.
Director William Castle, a "Poor Man's" Alfred Hitchcock, uses every trick in the book in an effort to make this film work from a woman dancer painted in gold (pre- "Goldfinger) to a man wrestling a bear ala the Samson vs the lion in "Samson and Delilah" ... but nothing can save this
clunker.
What reason did a great character actor like Donald Sutherland have to make a
clunker
like this, only god knows.
Unbelievable that a movie this amateurish even got a decent release, I purchased this
clunker
at Best Buy.
The flat, fumbling direction by Harry Hope and Lee Sholem, Stuart J. Byrne's tediously talky and uneventful script, the dull performances and the slower than two aged turtles walking uphill pace suck all the fun and vitality out of this excruciatingly leaden science fiction
clunker.
The only reason I even give it a 2 is because I like Prinze and Forlani...who are both dreadful in this poorly scripted, ineptly directed
clunker.
Wow. Another
clunker
from Canadian "auteur" Andrew Van Slee.
this movie is a
clunker.
One never knows, at first, whether it is just a false note, the sound of things falling and continuing to roll briefly before finally coming to a stop, or a real clunker, a more jarring interruption, the herald of a real crisis.
Back
Related words
Movie
Acting
Waste
Reason
People
About
Thought
Script
Poorly
Great
Character
Actors
Would
Woman
While
Watch
Version
Trick
Total
Title