Example collocations logo

Clearly in sentence

4368 examples of Clearly in a sentence

I can't believe I was so young when I saw it, because it made such a deep impression on me and I understood it so clearly, even at a young age.
Worse, she's directed to be too terrific--enunciating very clearly and loudly, as if to reach the back row, all the details of a complex human being are ironed out.
The erotic tension between the women, the intersexual and Mike Connors (and this reviewer) clearly trumps the need for camouflage as the floozies compete with the intersexual for the chance to caress Mike's big, hairy arms.
The most important thing is that real facts are well-presented and narrated very clearly.
The motivation to make it in the first place clearly comes from someone finding a big abandoned house in which to shoot the majority of this very unscary piece or rubbish.
If he did, it fell flat on its face with the dubbed Australian and Texas accents against the faces of people clearly from an Asian background.
Clearly these faded stars needed a paycheck.
Michael Winterbottom is clearly a director who like several of his British contemporaries such as Mike Leigh and Shane Meadows, believes that the drama around us in everyday life is worthy of the big screen.
However, there are some other scenes, clearly going for the big laughs, that are not as successful, like the one with the KKK or the ones in the bank near the end of the film, and they threaten to spoil the fun.
When clearly, and I mean, clearly, this is not the case.
It presents a pastor who is clearly flawed and sinful, as all of us are.
There is a limitation on how many units any player(human or computer-controlled) can control(clearly shown, in any given level), which rules out the often applied strategy(for other RTS titles) of just attacking the enemy with a swarm of powerful units, and necessitates proper strategy.
It is my heartfelt belief that no clearly thinking individual who considers him- or herself to be a student of either WWII aviation history or modern cinematography could possibly find this to be a good (or even decent) movie, from ANY standpoint.
The only odd thing is that the Duke is billed 3rd when it is clearly his film.
However, her part is pretty flat and she clearly acts in support of Wayne.
But, once again he was clearly not the leading character but the villain.
It is amazing how weird and unintelligent Americans are, as is clearly shown with many of the teams.
This is clearly the worst Wesley Snipes movie I have ever seen.
Edward G. put his heart and soul in his role and clearly showed his great professional acting abilities.
Here's why: this version concentrates almost entirely on the love story at its centre and to carry its ideas through successfully, the relationship at its core has to be believable - which it clearly isn't.
Plus, in one scene the agent asks for room and the manager clearly hands him a car key!!
The violence/gore is too sparse and VERY badly done (there is a scene of a stabbing where you can clearly see that the knife is just thrust to the left of the victim), with the exception of a couple of death sequences.
Clearly, this was just another typical 70s horror, no budget revenge/bad guys getting what they deserve flick, a la 'Last House on the Left.'
Killing of the "innocent" also clearly demonstrate that somewhere on the Path we have to stop using outside criteria for "good" and "bad" and use only our own, hopefully already developed at that point.
Flynn was clearly comfortable with light comedy; it featured some great "bad guy" work by Robert Douglas; and, despite production problems caused BY Flynn's excesses, the editing in of sequences from Robin Hood and Elizabeth and Essex worked very well.
even when he is being slaughter by a retard caveman he hardly even snapped out of his rubbish acting induced coma, they should have smashed that cleaver into his head for real cos nobody would even realise he was gone and those that did clearly would have rejoiced.
Clearly the film is a labor of love and it shows.
Doesn't that demonstrate that the material is clearly non-cinematic?
Clearly this is one of the classic examples of a 60's and 70's Movie adaptation of a book that is an unsung masterpiece of how you can as a producer, Director of Photography, Set Designer or Special Effects coordinator relay the textual concept, intention and feel of the original author in to a visual and intellectual Science Fiction thriller.
Then it does a really bad job at setting the stage for the mystery: it never takes the time to clearly help the audience understand the lay-out of the house or where people are supposed to be so that when the murder happens, we really understands that there is clearly something unsolvable about the mystery which would help grad audience attention.
BackNext