Cinematography
in sentence
1385 examples of Cinematography in a sentence
Thomas Susanto's pedestrian cinematography, the laughably lousy dubbing, the excruciatingly overlong 102 minute running time, the sappy theme song, and Gatot Sudarto's cornball score add further abject insult to already appalling injury.
Even the outstanding
cinematography
left me uninspired.
The plot was completely predictable, the editing was rather limited, I swear the editor was even dozing off near the end when he was cutting this movie, and the direction was clouded by bad
cinematography.
Even consumer mini-DV cameras are capable of producing white whites and black blacks, and this filmmaker is just being lazy by shooting no contrast scenes with existing lighting: the subject is bleak enough without artificially forcing it with sloppy
cinematography.
The martial arts moves themselves are fine but the
cinematography
is pathetic.
And I hear everyone, even the haters of this film, talk about how gorgeous the
cinematography
is.
When we(EX YU) make films, lots of symbolism is build in it, which makes the characters recognisable and likable, and mostly portraying the truth(if it is based on true story) The films like "Pritty village, pretty flame", "Tito and Me', "Underground',"No mans land', "Before the Rain","Black cat, white cat","Otac na sluzbenom putu",(When father was away on business),"Ko to tamo peva"(Who sings over there?)Rare the masterpiece of the Balkan cinematography,and nothing can compare to it.
The best thing about the movie is the cinematography, but even the dark landscape of the cave becomes soon boring, because the film lacks pace and the characters are simply not interesting.
The
cinematography
is poor, and the acting even more so.
only good thing about this movie is those green , sprawling land scapes , winding roads, and pleasant
cinematography.
This movie has terrible everything: The dialog is corny and cliché', the acting is poor for the most part with a few exceptions, the
cinematography
is nothing to cheer about, and the plot is silly (A fat woman stalks a suburban family because her daughter didn't make the soccer team).
This Killjoy film has better
cinematography
and is more professional looking than the last.
The
cinematography
was OK, but apart from this, the plot was just as commonorgarden and run-of-the-mill as any other war story.
The acting was horrific, the costumes were ugly (the little boy's was especially ugly and girlish), and the
cinematography
was z-grade.
It's painfully clear that all effort in this film was directed toward
cinematography
and very little attention to everything else.
The cinematography, costumes, and sets look great.
Still, there are other aspects apart of the film that work - the
cinematography
is well done, Rachel Portman contributes a lovely score, and while no one is at their best, Liam Neeson, Joan Allen, Patricia Arquette, and Tate Donovan work well in their roles.
The
cinematography
was surprisingly good considering such minimal budget.
The
cinematography
was a joke and I was even more amused when they used a quote from the Bible!
The
cinematography
lingered on the uninspired.
Fat Man and Little Boy was a movie that had good intentions in mind, but muddled them rather badly by the choice of actors, script, and
cinematography.
The quality of the
cinematography
reminds me of reality TV shows.
What 'Darkness' has going for it is remarkable direction and
cinematography.
See it, if you dare to have a disagreeable eye-opening about how sadly deprived we are of true religious leaders, to the extent that a clown like Gurdjieff could inspire such devotion - and be careful to have your blood pressure medicine at hand if you are one of those who still hope for a healthy religion to emerge from the ruins of Christianity, as a supreme example of
cinematography
at the entire service of the premises and pretenses of a dysfunctional cult.
And, the beautiful
cinematography
certainly makes the rich countryside of Spain seem lush.
The
cinematography
appears right out of basic cable MOW land which removes any semblance of swampy, murky atmosphere from the proceedings.
But the atrocious acting, amateurish
cinematography
and terrible dubbing make this film achingly bad.
It is a shame that a movie with such a good
cinematography
as this one had no plot to be supported by the work of Sarah Cawley (cinematography) and Adam Lichtenstein (Film Editing), and above all, no sense of what goes on in Mexico City.
The truth is that polish
cinematography
can not afford producing fantasy films.
Great
cinematography
?
Back
Next
Related words
Acting
Movie
Great
Story
Score
Music
Beautiful
Direction
Excellent
There
Which
Script
Editing
About
Actors
Really
Performances
Scenes
Characters
Makes