Cinematography
in sentence
1385 examples of Cinematography in a sentence
Everything about this film is simply terrible: the musical score (someone shoot the guy who invented the Yamaha keyboard), the script, the directing, the cinematography, the acting.
If it weren't for the beautiful
cinematography
and scenery, it would deserve a negative rating.
Even some of the worst movies in Hollywood have some level of professionalism in the directing, acting and
cinematography
departments.
Saving Grace doesn't seem to know what it wants to be: the stunning
cinematography
and stately pace evoke memories of Ryan's Daughter whilst the light-hearted whimsy of the country townsfolk could be lifted from any episode of Antiques Roadshow.
The editing is ridiculous, the
cinematography
was random at best, every single syllable of dialogue was completely retarded and the directing ... well, was there even a director there?
Ahead of its time and groundbreaking in cinematography, it surely defines the word 'masterpiece'.
As far as
cinematography
goes, this film was pretty good for the mid 50's.
It was nice cinematography, with good colours, cool hi-tec stuff, beautiful scenics but leaves you lost about where it's going and where it has just been.
It is relentlessly unfunny, the
cinematography
is crappy and the direction is pedestrian.
The
cinematography
is not bad but it looks like it was cut with a machete.
they had beautiful
cinematography
(sp?) and interesting characters, but it seemed as if the writers assumed you already knew them.
The only good thing is the
cinematography
and the cutter's Job.
Incidentally, the
cinematography
is not great; the stills for the closing credits are a better indication of what David Hamilton is capable of.
A music score by David Raskin,
cinematography
by Lucien Ballard and Oscar-nominated costumes contribute mightily.
I still think the directing and
cinematography
are excellent, as is the music.
You want pretty colors and
cinematography?
This movie was an insult to watch, the direction was high school film class quality as well as the
cinematography.
The Blair Witch Project had better
cinematography
and I hate that move with a passion!
it is weighed down by dreadful acting, a genuinely dire script, indifferent
cinematography
and student-level production values.
No noteworthy characters, unbelievable storyline, questionable editing and horrendous
cinematography
but worst of all, I couldn't have cared less.
It's also very poorly made, surprisingly so considering it came from MGM. Leonard Smith's bare bones
cinematography
is strictly from the 'set up the camera and don't move it' school, frequently to the detriment of the cast, who find themselves delivering lines off screen (it's like a pan and scan print before such existed!) or having their heads cut off.
The
cinematography
is lame, and the sets are sometimes just facades.
The Haunting is yet another bad horror remake with phony overdone special effects and a big cast of on screen favorites and has no redeeming qualities whatsoever except maybe for the cinematography.Yes remakes aren't all bad but remakes directed by Jion Da Bont definitely are.I suppose that the A-List actors (Liam Neeson,Catherine Zeta Jones,Owen Wilson)are there to distract us from the boring plot,ridiculous special effects, and terrible attempts at scaring it's audience however this is a movie not a tabloid magazine we don't care whose in it we care about the characters and story two things this film missed.The storyline is like taking the classic novel The Haunting Of Hill House and ripping out four chapters and then using whatever's left for the film it is so boring and a lot of it is unexplained.The characters are pretty thin and while the acting is good you don't really care about any of the characters at all.Lily Taylor gives a horrendous performance and sounds like she's 8 years old when delivering her lines not to mention what a horrible screamer she is.Lily Taylor isn't made for the horror genre at all.The ghosts are stupid and cheesy, they look like a bunch of Casper The Friendly Ghost's and the ghost of Hugh Cain looks like a fat guy dressed as the grim reaper for Halloween with a smoke machine.There is this creature on the roof of one of the rooms that is a giant purple mouth and it's not even funny unintentionally just plain sad.The house is pretty and well designed that is probably the only positive thing about this movie it looks nice but that doesn't save it from it's brutal everything else.I can honestly say i felt like i was wasting my time watching The Haunting on TV for no price so I would've been even more pi$$ed if I had paid to see it but luckily it was on Scream Channel.Overall The Haunting is a boring remake that tries to overwhelm you with bad special effects, a poor attempt at horror.
The acting, directing, cinematography, and storyline were all horrible.
However,
cinematography
was OK and if you are a person who loves adventure genres which explores Africa then go for it.
Sure, the viewer is treated to numerous fine scenes of Los Angeles in the thirties--I especially liked the view of the trolley approaching the tunnel, and the tram rising up the hillside--but in a sense this fine
cinematography
is self-defeating, because it creates a mood that "something's going to happen"--and nothing does.
It has very good
cinematography.
Just face it the ending is on of the worst endings in the history of cinematography! 4 left and the whole world has ended!
The film is crude in its
cinematography
and editing and not worth seeing unless you are fascinated by the director.
Technically the film is OK considering it was made 70 years ago, the black & white
cinematography
is adequate although some of the scenes look like they were shot against a photo of the background location.
Back
Next
Related words
Acting
Movie
Great
Story
Score
Music
Beautiful
Direction
Excellent
There
Which
Script
Editing
About
Actors
Really
Performances
Scenes
Characters
Makes