Chess in sentence

295 examples of Chess in a sentence

After the 7th century Islamic conquest of Persia, chess was introduced to the Arab world.

Diplomats and courtiers used chess terms to describe political power.

In China, chess pieces were placed at intersections of board squares rather than inside them, as in the native strategy game Go.

But it was in Europe that chess began to take on its modern form.

Moralists cautioned against devoting too much time to them, with chess even being briefly banned in France.

And with the rise of international competition, chess took on a new geopolitical importance.

During the Cold War, the Soviet Union devoted great resources to cultivating chess talent, dominating the championships for the rest of the century.

Today, chess software is capable of consistently defeating the best human players.

So this was an unprogrammed area where people could pretty much do anything, including eat, yell, play chess and so forth.

(Speaks Spanish) A fallen king chess piece in red.

Or competitive games like chess where, well, you're not trying to solve ...

You can make a chess puzzle, but the goal really is to beat another player.

Consider, by analogy, the game of chess.

Now, if you're going to play good chess, a principle like, "Don't lose your Queen," is very good to follow.

And yet, chess is a domain of perfect objectivity.

If you presented it with a chess board, it tried to figure out what you might mean by that.

And if there was nothing for them to do, the chess pieces eventually got bored and hopped away.

If you ask how is power distributed in the world today, it's distributed much like a three-dimensional chess game.

Middle board of this three-dimensional chess game: economic power among states.

This movie had all the potential and makings of a great feel good, great love story...the cast is perfect, the visuals work, the original premise works, the characters work....but the story moves from one chess move to the next in a most predictable way...not one character in the movie has any depth or has any depth explained by the director.

Character development appears static, and the characters seem like chess pieces on an abandoned chess board, thereby earning a rank of 3. The dialogue seems stilted, and appears to be forced to fit some Bowery pattern of speech--a 4 for dialogue.

I got the image of tackling chess pieces out of the playing board.

I am not a chess grandmaster or a computer scientist.

I don't doubt that Kasparov and the chess community found IBM's behavior vexing, but I don't think it's any different than you would find from any other big corporation.

thought it would be about the second chess match between Grandmaster Garry Kasporov and Deep Blue the supercomputer designed by IBM computer experts to beat any human chess player.Kasparov was and still is,considered the greatest chess player ever.the

people not into chess or conspiracy theories,this movie would probably have no value.i

am a chess fan,and i only stuck it out because of that.i

Being an admitted chess addict, I was excited to see a documentary about the 1997 rematch between Garry Kasparov and IBM's Deep Blue supercomputer.

I'm writing this note as a chess player as well as as a movie viewer.

Other chess players will come along and want to know whether this movie is worth seeing/buying, and I'm talking largely to them.

Related words