Example collocations logo

Budget in sentence

5887 examples of Budget in a sentence

A mini budget film made in 1983 called GOING DOWN got this topic right and is an excellent antidote to this poison.
Made on a budget somewhere in the vicinity of $1.99, "The Cavern" is obviously a quick cheapie made to piggyback on the current bunch of scary cave-lots of darkness-claustrophobic spelunkers-unknown menace flicks like "The Cave" and "The Descent".
And don't use "low budget" as an excuse...I have seen many GREAT low-budget films....in fact some of the best horror classics of all time were low-budget.
This is a low budget movie and it shows.
Cant really say much about the special effects cause there aren't that many but the few there is ranges from bad to OK(for a low budget that is).
Okay, first I should say that I assume this was just made by a group of friends with a limited budget.
The anachronisms (modern telephones) were annoying to me, not clever, seeming more like budget constraints than anything else.
The cinematography was surprisingly good considering such minimal budget.
Jack-O (1995) was a really bad movie, we are talking snoozefest x 100, no entertainment value whatsoever, no budget, no gore, Z-grade actors etc etc, this film was an awful addition to the horror movie industry and shouldn't have been made!!!
So when the critics unleashed their fury against "The Cat in the Hat", another big budget Seuss update with a big name star in the title role, I thought that it must be the same old song.
There's nothing particularly unique or interesting about this run of the mill low budget sci-fi flick.
Someone, somewhere, said, this is how to make a movie: use a blue filter to make everything look mysterious, add plenty of slow motion shots of horse hooves splashing in murky puddles, add snowflakes hovering around while two boring characters are speaking to each other, and oh yes rain pouring down dramatically to distract from the fact that nothing is really happening, and don't forget the black silhouettes walking toward us with fire blazing behind them, and lots of torches burning, and of course blurry fight scenes during which it's not clear what is actually happening because we don't have the budget for the gory special effects so just throw in the sound of metal clanking, and, oh, by the way, don't let any character live long enough for the audience to understand them, relate to them or sympathize with them, and cross fingers, hope that fans of sword and sorcery films will eat it up, even though it is complete doo doo, and go straight to video, do not pass GO . . .
I love low budget movies.
I appreciate the difficulties in trying to bring a novel to the screen, especially on what may very well have been a limited (TV) budget, but there is no excuse for mangling a great story in this way.
The acting, while no great shakes, was slightly above par for horror movies in this budget range.
It's been said that some directors make small budget pictures look like blockbusters.
Albert Pyun makes small budget pictures look like high school A/V project films.
When the budget doesn't allow for a Cadillac or Packard or Lincoln or Imperial hearse we are talking cheep cheep.
Sure enough... Give me a break with the awful acting, horrible camera work, poor use of the budget (that has been mentioned over and over again as an excuse).
the only reason i gave it a 2 was because the first 10 minutes were hysterically funny in a "is this for real??" sort of way. it was so cheesy and low budget...they should not have even bothered.
I have seen many - possibly too many straight-to-video, no budget slasher films and have developed a taste for the "good ones", or the ones that are less sucky, as ridiculous as that sounds, hahaha.
It is a very low budget movie.
It could have been much better but oh well they didn't had a big budget.
Im all for low budget movies and I generally watch any I come across but this one is really really bad.
What's worse, HE'S the NAME in this low budget, mindless, wandering, wannabe shoot'em up.
"Soultaker" is a low budget, silly film about a group of 20-something year olds being pursued by an angel of death.
This is a very tame movie and there wasn't even enough budget to buy a couple bags of fake blood.
Whereas traditionally low budget spooky movies are often trying to catch their audience by adding plenty of graphic violence, this one is trying to catch an audience by throwing religious mambo jumbo at the spectator.
I realize this is a very low budget film made by a small independent company, but if you're going to do a sci-fi horror flick with giant bugs, don't make the giant bugs completely unbelievable.
I was expecting to view a more exploitation style of film but unfortunately this turned out to be just a badly made low budget action flick that just doesn't have the talent for that.
BackNext