Example collocations logo

Budget in sentence

5887 examples of Budget in a sentence

It really gets on my nerves when a low budget, pointless horror affair tries to look interesting in the credits by having a bunch of good names pop up in the cast, only to involve each one in the smallest, most pointless possible roles.
As audacious and ambitious as "Putney Swope" strives to be, it qualifies as a terrible film, amateurishly made on a shoe-string budget with a no-name cast and humor that lacks hilarity.
I am sure we are all sick and tired of the low budget ploy to make Vampire Movies using some "Martial Arts Teacher" turn "actor" type of movies.
Its just too bad that they spent all their budget on that and left nothing for the rest of the film.
I realize even the Weissmuller films have a few flaws but this one seemed so "low budget".
This is one seriously cheesy movie, and the whole thing was obviously done on a shoestring budget, although the alien isn't too bad (I've seen far less convincing men-in-rubber-suits at any rate).
A low budget movie can still be good if only they would stop accepting and using the worst scripts around.
Low budget junk about bloodthirsty cultists in Greece headed by Peter Cushing.
Zombie Planet seems like an example of good ideas and laudable ambition overstepping budget.
The rest of the gore was effective in a low budget kinda way, but too spaced apart throughout the movie.
Sure, they had a intriguing, if derivative plot line, and a similarly familiar but cool setting, but a low budget zombie film really needs to be goretastic to make an impression and there just weren't enough red moments in this for me.
It's a shame that Patrick Swayze has to play in such a low budget movies.
The filmmakers obviously didn't know how to make the most of their low budget and the script seems as if it was turned out in one or two days.
Taken out of context, if one did not know Brooks' work before viewing, the movie would be a lame big budget film that isn't sure if it wants to be fat joke and stupid comedy, or just an ordinary action film with nothing to move on.
Because as much as I applaud what he accomplished on a clearly "next to nothing" budget, when I popped out the DVD, I just wondered why I sat through almost two hours of nothing.
this movie is quite bad, aggressive, not played well, not directed well, seems low budget, low quality,emotionaly weak and disconnected.
this movie looks like a 60's old and purely made film with cast of grown neanderthals, not to mention (or actually do), not paying attention to details like changing rounds, low budget fireworks and all sorts of poorly filmed characteristic.
Now I understand that this is a B movie and that it doesn't have the same size budget as bigger films but surely they could have spent their money in a better way than making this garbage.
It is is very sad to see someone of the calibre of George C Scott in a low budget thriller which would have been better if the original novel was written by Graham Greene and directed by someone somewhat more experienced in the genre.
But there was a lot of shooting,acting,dramatic,theatrical and storytelling problems.I can understand because of director is very young and Gomeda is his first feature film.OK Directing of this film was not pretty bad,I see.Unfortunately, due to the restraints placed on the film by its extremely low budget, the visuals are often as murky as the storyline.And there is no powerful Gothic scenes.As a horror movie it really fails, no scares at all and it is quite muddled and boring.
You can expect to have a low budget on a movie, but I don't think it's reasonable to have a low movie for any budget.
I can partially forgive this, in light of the film's $250 budget.
The overall impression is that someone was given a below average script, wannabe actors, an average director and absolutely no budget whatsoever.
Funny how low the budget is, funny how predictable it is, funny how bad the acting is and funny how much money it DIDNT make.
Honestly, this movie must have the budget of a low grade porno.
They reeked of low budget, and really ruined the viewers entertainment, even if he had been remotely interested in the plot.
I have years of experience in the film (more importantly the low budget indie film) industry.
This makes it difficult when trying to decide whether I view this film as an example of unique style in film making, or just another low budget, poorly put together film.
But if you are still somewhat intrigued it is a "Buck Rogers in the 25th Century" premise without space ships and with no budget for wardrobe or production design.
We'll get the cheapest 'actors' we can find, we'll have my mentally challenged cousin write the script, and we'll spend the budget on a bunch of explosions.
BackNext