Benefits
in sentence
4904 examples of Benefits in a sentence
Nor would old enemies and competitors like Russia and China readily abandon the
benefits
of spoiling American plans.
Finally, Fatah did a terrible job at governing, bringing Palestinians neither material
benefits
nor a state.
If the North abandons its nuclear weapons program, many
benefits
can be gained.
More broadly, we need to work to ensure that the
benefits
of technology are shared by all.
The lower marginal tax rates induced individuals to work more and to receive more of their potential income in taxable cash rather than in fringe
benefits
and other forms of compensation that are not subject to tax.
The Netherlands, after its discovery of North Sea gas and oil, found itself plagued with growing unemployment and workforce disability (many of those who could not get jobs found disability
benefits
to be more generous than unemployment benefits.)
Second, anyone visiting Japan recognizes the
benefits
of its infrastructure investments (America could learn a valuable lesson here).
There is every reason to believe that Japan’s strategy for rejuvenating its economy will succeed: the country
benefits
from strong institutions, has a well-educated labor force with superb technical skills and design sensibilities, and is located in the world’s most (only?) dynamic region.
Can East Asian countries overcome their legacy of conflict to forge a common future that
benefits
all?
This might seem to imply that the EU needs to be able to impose looser terms of cooperation, including fewer
benefits
from membership.
In contrast to the US, information on GMOs in Europe emphasizes risk rather than
benefits
(in particular, reduced use of pesticides and insecticides).
American democracy’s emphasis on short time horizons is costly, with tax cuts and increased welfare
benefits
giving rise to chronic fiscal deficits, with future generations forced to foot the bill for years of excessive consumption.
Along with Mohamed bin Zayed bin Sultan Al Nahyan, Crown Prince of Abu Dhabi, we attach great importance to the world’s first global summit, being held this week in Abu Dhabi, aimed at ensuring that all children have access to the full
benefits
of vaccines.
The World Health Assembly, representing the World Health Organization’s 194 member countries, has endorsed a shared vision – known as the Decade of Vaccines – of a world free from vaccine-preventable diseases, with the full
benefits
of immunization reaching all people, regardless of who they are or where they live.
In a finite world, infinite growth is impossible, and rising output will not put food on everyone’s table if the
benefits
of growth are not fairly distributed.
The Joint Statement, while clinically welcoming the agreement, states that both parties “thereby turn their focus to the future of their bilateral relationship,” underscoring “the
benefits
an expansion of ties would provide for both countries as well as for the American and Libyan peoples.”
As the
benefits
of globalization became manifest, and the damage wrought by autarkic policies also became evident, policymakers in the East began to appreciate that their anti-globalization stance had been a mistake.
If individuals and countries are to continue to reap the
benefits
of education, policymakers must focus on the skills required to prosper in a rapidly changing world.
A shift in focus to economic development will save a vast number of lives and convert the unthinkably large economic costs of war into economic
benefits
through development.
But if Asia is to move beyond its past, the victims of Japan’s wartime aggression must recognize that the Japan of 2015 is not the Japan of 1931, 1941, or even 1945, and that, as many Asian leaders have realized over the years, forgiveness
benefits
everyone.
They worry that even after undertaking structural reforms to reduce the attractiveness of unemployment
benefits
and increase the ability of workers to move to jobs and of firms to move to workers, central bankers will continue to insist on tight money.
The Petri-Plummer study predicts that the bulk of the economic
benefits
of the TPP will come from reductions in non-tariff barriers (such as regulatory barriers on imported services) and lower obstacles to foreign investment.
But those who believe that this trade agreement, like previous ones, will provide lopsided
benefits
have ample reason to be concerned.
After centuries of isolation and colonial slumber, the region is now awake to the potential
benefits
of greater unity.
As Germany knows from its own experience in the early 2000s, the
benefits
of supply-side reforms – namely, improved competitiveness and higher long-term growth rates – take a long time to emerge.
Given the current combination of a high fiscal multiplier – raised further by widespread overcapacity – and exceptionally low borrowing costs, all of these
benefits
could be gained without any net fiscal cost.
At the same time, Bush supported expenditure increases for popular items like education and prescription drug benefits, but paid for these services by borrowing the money rather than ensuring sufficient tax revenues.
When Bush asked for spending cuts at the beginning of the year – including a social security reform that includes cuts in future
benefits
– world financiers expected that Bush would get his way, or most of it.
They value the Union for its economic benefits, but are wary of its politics.
Government spending – especially on unemployment benefits, aid to states, and some construction projects – probably helped avert a more wrenching downturn, but continued red ink worries households, which are also trying to rebuild savings and reduce debt after a spending binge.
Back
Next
Related words
Would
Economic
Costs
Their
Which
Countries
Social
Other
Could
While
People
Growth
Trade
Should
There
Health
About
Global
World
Unemployment
