Benefits
in sentence
4904 examples of Benefits in a sentence
Professor Claudia Kemfert of the German Institute for Economic Research (DIW) argues that spending $14 billion to $30 billion to reduce methane would create
benefits
– from the reduction in warming – between 1.4 and three times higher.
Doing so would yield other
benefits
as well.
The net annual
benefits
would run into several billion dollars, which equates to $3.60 worth of avoided climate damage for each dollar spent.
Costs and
benefits
matter.
They wanted trade and other
benefits
of recognition, which would benefit both nations in those Cold War days, when China was fiercely hostile to the Soviet Union, with which it had almost gone to war only a few years earlier.
These claims can be exchanged for various benefits, such as family leave, retraining, or supplementary retirement income.
Research by the World Bank suggests that every dollar of assistance provided to support trade-facilitation reform in developing countries yields a return of up to $70 in economic
benefits.
A World Bank study estimates that the costs of implementing the measures likely to be covered by a Trade Facilitation agreement would be relatively modest – $7-11 million in the countries studied, spread out over a number of years – especially when compared to the expected
benefits.
In international negotiations, there is always a way forward if the
benefits
of an agreement are shared by all.
Some support repeal and replace anyway: Senator Rand Paul of Kentucky, for example, is a relatively consistent libertarian who believes that the
benefits
of minimizing the government’s role in health care somehow outweigh the costs to lower- and middle-income working Americans.
Taking into account a variety of far-reaching positive effects, we find that every dollar spent on neonatal care generates about $9 in
benefits.
Every dollar spent on better nutrition for the young produces $45 of social
benefits.
Not only would this be relatively cheap; it would also provide children with a life-long yearning for learning, boosting their life chances and delivering
benefits
worth $33 for every dollar invested.
The International Monetary Fund has documented many other macroeconomic
benefits
associated with women’s empowerment.
So, if paternalism has
benefits
as well as costs, how do we get the former without the latter?
The SEC’s rejection of the proposed rules demonstrates the power of concerted lobbying – and that concentrated interests often trump diffuse
benefits.
With the world’s richest 1% now owning 40% of its assets, the
benefits
of growth are not being shared in a way that is either economically efficient or politically sustainable.
The new agency would gradually streamline procedures; establish common rules for employment and entrepreneurship, as well as consistent benefits; and develop an effective, rights-respecting return policy for migrants who do not qualify for asylum.
But US President Donald Trump now seems determined to do away with the economic and strategic
benefits
of that longstanding relationship.
The first option would require coercion, and – since countries will not accept that others should gain a competitive edge – an international agreement to forego the
benefits
that genetic enhancement can bring.
A six-article series, “The German Nuclear Exit,” in the Bulletin of the Atomic Scientist argues that the move away from nuclear energy is already “yielding measurable economic and environmental benefits.”
Three other big
benefits
would also have resulted from giving the award to an Indonesian.
Rather than carefully balancing the
benefits
of each government expenditure program with the costs of raising taxes to finance those benefits, the right seeks to use a sledgehammer – not allowing the national debt to increase forces expenditures to be limited to taxes.
Growth itself increases tax revenues and reduces the need for social expenditures, such as unemployment
benefits.
The potential
benefits
of public investment are not limited to developing countries.
The “yes” campaign hoped to win supporters with a utopian vision of an independent Scotland that included European Union and NATO membership; a currency union with England, but no fiscal union; improved public services and social benefits; and lower taxes.
But potentially significant costs offset these small
benefits.
Yes, the ESM
benefits
from low borrowing costs, which are essentially passed on to borrowing countries.
To reap the benefits, sub-Saharan Africa must form an oil-based confederation under the tutelage of thoroughly reformed regional groupings aimed at encouraging economic integration and political union.
Economically, this is a lose-lose proposition for the UK, which will now forego the
benefits
of free exchange with the rest of the EU, as well as the contributions of hard-working, tax-paying EU migrants.
Back
Next
Related words
Would
Economic
Costs
Their
Which
Countries
Social
Other
Could
While
People
Growth
Trade
Should
There
Health
About
Global
World
Unemployment
