Example collocations logo

Argument in sentence

1858 examples of Argument in a sentence

But investors should be wary of this argument.
This argument has been ignored.
The new anti-Semitism, however, cannot be fought successfully by education and argument in the rest of the world alone.
(Can Germany Still Be Saved?) stands out for its cogent argument.
Consider the main economic argument offered by federalists: the eurozone needs a common fiscal policy to harmonize policy decisions, such as taxation.
The official argument for the 3% exclusion is that it affects “sensitive products.”
If the euro generated these imbalances, the argument goes, country-level solutions are inadequate.
Overt Monetary Finance and Crisis ManagementBill White’s commentary responds to my argument, set out in a lecture at Cass Business School, that overt monetary finance (OMF) of increased fiscal deficits should not be a taboo policy option.
Thus, while White rightly points out that existing policies to increase the monetary base have elicited little or no response from broader monetary aggregates, this in no way undermines the argument for OMF.
For example, I agree with White’s argument for “more public and private investment.”
Such a policy might assuage the fear – which White does not mention but that for many is the central argument against OMF – that once the taboo is broken, political pressures will lead inevitably to harmful overuse of OMF.
The economic argument for renewable energy is also compelling.
A variant of the economic argument for European unity is the claim that enhanced integration makes it easier to finance debt, because interest rates are lower.
As Asians drive growth toward more sustainable patterns, they will increase the incentives for others to do so by generating new technology, lowering the environmental cost of growth, and undercutting the argument that leadership incurs competitive and other economic costs, but few benefits.
Still, I believe there can be little serious argument about the importance of a policy aimed at avoiding major further increases in CO2 emissions.
The argument that all parties – surrogate mothers, babies, and commissioning parents – benefit from the transaction has not withstood scrutiny.
That development might at first seem to support the argument that the trade can never be stamped out – only relocated.
Because the economic benefits from these sources of wealth are more questionable, the argument that these fortunes should be protected from redistribution is far less compelling.
The argument for legislative action is tantalizingly simple: the US merchandise trade deficit has averaged a record 4.4% of GDP since 2005, with China accounting for fully 35% of the shortfall, supposedly owing to its currency manipulation.
Europe’s austerians, as the Nobel laureate economist Paul Krugman likes to call them, lost the argument.
The decoupling argument also assumes that recession in America has no effect on Asia.
The report’s argument in favor of free trade is not new, nor is its recommendation that “active labor-market policies” be used to cushion the blow of lost jobs and livelihoods.
To be effective and persuasive, however, such fear often requires a rational, seemingly credible argument.
Of course, that is an argument against badly designed bank bailouts, like the one in America, which has cost US taxpayer hundreds of billions of dollars, much of it never to be recovered.
This argument is not very convincing, at least when applied to Europe.
This is important, because the traditional argument of last resort against capital controls has been that they could not be made to stick.
The influential report “One market, one money,” issued in 1990 under the leadership of the former French Finance Minister Jacques Delors, called for the creation of a single currency, relying on the specious argument that the single market could not function well otherwise.
Just as the Fed and the ECB have apparently saved the day through their unconventional and aggressive quantitative easing (QE), goes the argument, Abe believes it is now time for the BOJ to do the same.
Where, in a purely deductive argument, was there room for nature's surprises, for mechanisms that look nothing like what we imagine in our initial assumptions?
They reflected only the desire "that the argument be easy to follow."
BackNext