Argue in sentence

2151 examples of Argue in a sentence

So, this is an example no one can argue with.

And what that means is that I argue.

And I like to argue.

But the more that I argue and the better I get at arguing, the more that I lose.

One is: why do we argue?

So why do we even try to argue?

But there's another twist on this model that I really think is important; namely, that when we argue before an audience, sometimes the audience has a more participatory role in the argument; that is, arguments are also [performances] in front of juries, who make a judgment and decide the case.

It dominates how we talk about arguments, it dominates how we think about arguments, and because of that, it shapes how we argue, our actual conduct in arguments.

But the war metaphor, the war paradigm or model for thinking about arguments, has, I think, deforming effects on how we argue.

Now, can you imagine an argument in which you are the arguer, but you're also in the audience, watching yourself argue?

Can you imagine yourself watching yourself argue, losing the argument, and yet still, at the end of the argument, saying, "Wow, that was a good argument!"

I would argue today, when we are distributing tools that we've designed and that don't necessarily make sense in people's lives, we run the risk of making the same mistake again.

Now I'm going to try and argue for a third alternative that's much more illuminating than either of those, and to put this into perspective, let's imagine that a Martian came down to Earth and found a ruined civilization.

I could do it again to show it one more time, but some would argue that this is a complete waste of the whiskey, and that I should rather drink it.

Some people would argue that today there is still no equal rights.

In fact, there are groups who would argue that they still do not have equal rights under the law.

I would argue the same thing that makes you more sustainble is what gives you a higher quality of life, and that's living in a walkable neighborhood.

I would argue that we should start by injecting into the global the local.

When you read about them, you will often read about them with an undertone of reverence and admiration, because they are the most integrated and the largest of all the Mexican organizations, and, many people argue, the world.

This would be a paradigm shift in healthcare, and I would argue that not only can it be done, but it has to be done.

There are people who argue that today's innovation is all about social media and silly games, with nowhere near the transformational power of the Industrial Revolution.

You might argue about the sanity of it, but the leverage is real.

Now there will be those who will argue that this could all too easily drift into a form of censorship, albeit self-censorship, but I don't buy that argument.

The most ardent of libertarians might argue that Donoghue v. Stevenson should have been thrown out of court and that Stevenson would eventually have gone out of business if he'd continued to sell ginger beer with snails in it.

We have the human systems of how we communicate and interrelate and have our whole constructed society, We have the industrial systems, which is essentially the entire economy, and then all of that has to operate within the biggest system, and, I would argue, the most important, the ecosystem.

What I'm saying is that to argue that our ancestors were sexual omnivores is no more a criticism of monogamy than to argue that our ancestors were dietary omnivores is a criticism of vegetarianism.

The sky is underutilized, and I would argue it will never be as congested as the roads are.

I'm going to argue that, in fact, business strategy has always been premised on assumptions about technology, that those assumptions are changing, and, in fact, changing quite dramatically, and that therefore what that will drive us to is a different concept of what we mean by business strategy.

Now what I'm going to argue is that those premises are, in fact, being invalidated.

And what I'm going to argue is that indeed something does distinguish the third, and it maps exactly on to the kind of Porter-Henderson logic that we've been talking about.

Related words