Animation
in sentence
1176 examples of Animation in a sentence
my god this is like drawing human ears on a cat, boobs on superman, or mickey mouse with blond shirley temple curls - even in
animation
it just doesn't work!
i'm no snob & I luv animation- simpsons, beavis & butthead, south park, even ice age & all the other new ones out there - over the hedge was great- but this is nuts - totally nuts- i could not accept that that many people are that ignorant & i kept hoping for a reason for the udders in the film - an explanation - none came - and at the end when they hold up this little newborn calf & half its belly is udder & they pronounce 'its a boy' i nearly choked!!!! please, writer/creator let us in on the joke!
In 1951, MGM and Looney Toons were making some of their very best cartoons--with amazing animation, exceptional backgrounds and great stories.
Then, in the late 40s, a new style of
animation
began to appear (such as the "Crusader Rabbit" series on TV)--animation with extremely simplistic artwork in order to save money.
Later, it got even worse as in addition to lousy
animation
and backgrounds, the stories themselves became almost unbearable for adults to watch.
The story isn't that bad but the
animation
is a horror and listening to the kid saying "boing-boing" incessantly is a pain.
Now the style of
animation
isn't the issue--it's different but nice enough.
Nothing special to see here, the
animation
has being outdated and the plot is a typical futuristic era.
The
animation
is fine, where this short suffers is in a lack of humor.
The
animation
is not great quality, the actors have wasted their voices for a worthless piece of garbage.
Totems, minions of the Egyptian God Sutek want the secret of
animation
life back and the puppets (when they surface) act with a previously unseen cleverness to attempt to destroy the ugly and very computer game looking Totems.
Nickelodeon produced Doug; Ren and Stimpy and Rockos Modern Life among other fine cartoons(Yes, this includes Spongebob).All had quirky, dreamlike
animation
and surprisingly sophisticated stories and dialog.
animation
is pretty poor all over,the characters themselves are not very well drawn.the
I was hoping that this movie would contain some of the strong-points of the first movie: Awsome animation, good flowing story, excellent voice cast, funny comedy and a kick-ass soundtrack.
It's perfectly ok that people dies in an animation, but there are just way too many death in this one.
1st watched 7/29/2001 - 4 out of 10 (Dir-Mark Dindal): Fast-paced, frantic
animation
effort by Ted Turner's feature
animation
group plays a lot like tv cartoons and leaves a lot to be desired in the area of likeable characters, but definetly has extremely unlikeable villains.
Only worth seeing if you're an
animation
buff or is interested in how certain ethnicities were stereotyped as entertainment way back when.
It is always going to be hard to capture the feel of the comics in a film without using animation, and I didn't feel this attempt was worth it ultimately.
Now I'm a big
animation
fan -- love Svankmeyer and usually am into all applications of stop motion so I had high hopes for this one.
The art and
animation
are well drawn and the writing and dialog are generally good, though with notable exceptions.
The CG battles are clumsy as well, further enhancing the fact that CG and line
animation
do not mix well.
The story was lame, action wasn't all that great... especially compared to the Anime series... same goes for the quality of
animation.
I never read the book of Chris Van Allsburg in what it was inspired ,but the most disappointing is that it was directed by Robert Zemeckis ,the same who made the great "Who Framed Roger Rabbit?",a excellent movie where he proof that the
animation
could be appreciated for kids and adults equally ,while in this movie it seems that he was victim of his own ambition and he give too much importance to create impressive level of detail than a interesting story .I'm sorry to say this ,but "The Polar Express " have so much artistic level as a publicity campaign of a video -game or toy .
So if you don't like the cheesy, random comedy and amateur animation, steer clear of this one.
The
animation
is great, I'll concede to that.
The
animation
was even worse, we're in 2008 for god's sake and it looked like a shinier version of G.I.Joe.
The gags are adequate at best, the
animation
is competent, and the new restored DVD master looks nice.
Several of the bad things about this movie are that it has horrible characters, it has horrible comedy, horrible animation, and James Arnold Taylor trying to copy the wonderful, one and only Michael J. Fox as Milo James Thatch.
The reasons for my criticisms are that all the characters are changed into something that they never were, and never should be,
animation
that has been downgraded to the lowest extent possible, and finally, why would somebody who did wonderful voice-over work for Obi-Wan Kenobi in "Clone Wars" want to copy Michael J. Fox?
The
animation
scenes had absolutely terrible graphics.
Back
Next
Related words
Story
Movie
Great
Characters
Which
There
About
Music
First
Really
Their
Computer
Style
Original
Could
Action
Would
Beautiful
Still
Quality