Example collocations logo

Agreements in sentence

1458 examples of Agreements in a sentence

But, with negotiations on these global agreements far from complete, it is vital that policymakers’ emphasis on education continues to be reinforced.
That is the message that education ministers must emphasize at their upcoming forum, and that policymakers should heed as they negotiate this year’s two critical global agreements.
We would judge international agreements “not by how much is harmonized or by how many barriers are torn down but whether citizens are empowered.”
Finally, blockage of the multilateral process will trigger an even more pronounced shift toward bilateral or regional free trade agreements (FTA’s).
If designed badly, the cost of such agreements – in terms of trade diversion, confusion, and demands on limited administrative capacity – often exceeds the benefits.
Without agreements on the conditions of such exploitation there will remain imbalances of living conditions and the persistence of rival claims with their potential for future conflicts.
And, if financial innovations like derivatives and short-term repurchase agreements have made markets more volatile and fragile, a Tobin tax could help to stabilize and strengthen them.
By contrast, the US market’s enduring weight amplifies America’s bargaining power in plurilateral trade agreements, which also serve the country’s immediate commercial interests.
Last year, the Union concluded two Europol agreements, as well as an Extradition and Mutual Legal Assistance Agreement.
The Summit of Low ExpectationsSAN DIEGO – In the run-up to President Barack Obama’s first visit to China next month, American and Chinese diplomats have been compiling lists of ongoing cooperative endeavors in case no new agreements materialize.
Whereas agreements require hard work on both sides, the Americans are having a difficult time negotiating their country’s domestic political obstacles in time to engage effectively with China.
But substantive agreements on climate change, the financial crisis, or North Korea would require both countries to take actions that could be domestically costly.
The agreements have widespread support in Congress.
All of this should be seen in the context of the NCP’s long track record of human-rights abuses and reneging on agreements.
Indeed, most recent free-trade agreements require signatories to open up government procurement to one another’s firms, and the World Bank publishes the names of firms barred for fraud or corruption from bidding on Bank-financed projects.
When Chinese Premier Wen Jiabao visited India in 2005, he signed eleven agreements, including a comprehensive five-year strategic cooperation pact.
For example, we should reevaluate the current system for deciding trade agreements, which have become more about regulatory and investment issues than about eliminating import tariffs or other import barriers.
It is no surprise that even some free-trade supporters object to agreements that allow trade groups to insert language granting multinational corporations undue market power at the expense of consumer protection.
Indeed, through the Berlin Plus agreements, which facilitate use of NATO resources for missions undertaken under the European Defense and Security Policy (ESDP), NATO recognized the ESDP’s maturation over the past decade.
Moreover, the agreements foresee cooperation on cyber-security, terrorism, satellite communications, and maritime security, which are also key elements of the Lisbon Treaty.
Some 42 agreements were reportedly penned at the meeting, on issues ranging from outstanding trade and economic matters to the launch of a human rights commission.
While the US has stood on the sidelines, intra-Asian agreements have run ahead.
We need global rules, global agreements, global institutions.
The fact that the Cold War is over, and that NATO ceases to be geographically defined by the agreements reached by Churchill, Roosevelt, and Stalin at Yalta, seemingly so long ago, brings with it the need for the Alliance itself to truly recognize that it has undergone a substantial transformation.
Alas, one should not exaggerate the significance of such international agreements.
The global liberal order’s architects constructed a web of international agreements, trade arrangements, and military alliances to achieve three basic goals: promotion of open trade, prevention of catastrophic wars, and discouragement of economic nationalism by replacing a centuries-old zero-sum arrangement with a positive-sum framework under which all participating countries could prosper.
To this end, we have sharply accelerated the pace of negotiations on economic partnership agreements, or EPAs, with various partners around the world.
It confirms full visa liberalization as a long-term goal (with visa facilitation agreements in the meantime), promises enhanced cooperation on energy security, diversification, and efficiency, and comes with dedicated programs and projects to help the neighbors in their integration and reform efforts in all these areas.
Looking back to the four "red-green" years since 1998, one has to conclude that the neocorporatist style of "round-table" agreements between Big Business, Big Labour, and Big Government no longer works.
Here, unfair trade agreements – including the persistence of unjustifiable agricultural subsidies, which depress the prices upon which the income of many of the poorest depend – have played a role.
BackNext