Acting
in sentence
11391 examples of Acting in a sentence
This is seriously the worst movie I have ever seen, right from the start the movie goes straight down hill with its cheesy music score, poor acting, and total lack or real story or plot.
Now the
acting
is a bit better than you'd find in the Wood epics (such as PLAN 9 and BRIDE OF THE MONSTER), but the special effects managed to be significantly worse than Wood's!
Well, she must have done a decent job of
acting
to make me want to throw her and the VHS into the garbage pail.
Acting
gets worse as the show goes on.
If it were to be broken down, the
acting
was good enough to get the job done but the script was SO out there and so stupid that one was left thinking, "Where did my life go?"
It requires tremendous skill, pacing, patience, directorial 'distance,' a plausible premise, a narrative 'flow,' and REALLY believable
acting
(aka GREAT acting).
As a story that is surreal, this movie could've been great (as great as it is rated by some here), but mixed with the
acting
(director and relatives playing major roles, due to financial reasons I reckon) found in here ... although calling this acting, is not only a stretch of that word, it's giving it a new meaning!
Also, Min-sik Choi's
acting
was the only thing that allowed me to take this film seriously . . .
The emergence of Quentin Tarantino and his dubious influence on the likes of Guy Ritchie may have triggered the wave of appalling British gangster flicks we've been bequeathed over the past few years, but one of our most famous
acting
exports only serves to perpetuate the cycle by lending his considerable name to trash like this.
At least Armageddon has some good
acting
(compared to this), not to mention the eye candy that is Liv Tyler.
Forget the lousy acting, that can be forgiven in this sort of film.
I loved the first 15 minutes, and I loved some of the dialogue in the tribunal--which proved to be the best showcase for the director's ahead-of-its-time method
acting
technique--but this movie ultimately disappoints.
I am tired after seeing this movie, i don't know what i hated the most: the script, the acting, the FX or the music.
Everything about this movie was bad, the
acting
was bad and the plot was bad.
The
acting
performances are above average and the underwater photography is surprisingly clear and well-handled.
The
acting
was terrible as well with Kane showing, throughout the entire movie, at the very most 3 separate and distinct emotions.
The
acting
is really bad and sometimes just laughable.
Then there is this totally worthless
acting
of the whole cast, and you have enough reasons to leave this movie for what it is.
A reasonably good story but pretty awful acting, dialogue, and filming.
The
acting
is generally pretty weak.
Totally un-funny "jokes" that fall flat, amateurish
acting
(with one or two exceptions), boring characters and dialogue that's, at best, mediocre.
We witness occasional spells of good acting, however, this is quickly deflated by some quite cheesy lines.
Having watched the first scene, I realized the
acting
was so bad that it couldn't possibly pick up later.
The
acting
was pathetic and you could almost see the actors looking at the camera.
Bad
acting.
The
acting
in this film was terrible, I suppose the best actor was the guy from Lawnmower Man but the French guy from Aliens3 was so wooden I wondered how he got the former job in the first place.
The screenplay was poor, the
acting
was terrible and the effects, well there were no effects.
The
acting
forced.
The overall storyline isn't bad if you like that kind of thing but the
acting
is so far beyond poor that it amazes me that some of them actually entertained my in The X Files!
The
acting
was more wooden than my first sailboat, the equipment carried (or lack of it) was laughable, and the dialogue was, shall we say, lacking in ANYTHING interesting.
Back
Next
Related words
Movie
Story
Great
There
Script
Really
About
Effects
Terrible
Would
Characters
Actors
Which
Could
Their
Direction
Horrible
Writing
Special
Other