Acting
in sentence
11391 examples of Acting in a sentence
Enjoyed the
acting
of Ice-T and the rapping which gave lots of class to this film about Los Angeles and the world of pimps.
(Of course, she was eleven when this film was made, and a number of years away from her seeming decision that she would style her
acting
after early Helen Mirren: steamy looks and little clothing.)
Dorn appears to have a nice presence, and probably has the potential for a profitable
acting
career.
Though the
acting
isn't too bad, the predictable storyline and silly dialogue pretty much ruin this one from the get go.
All I can say is, this movie is made for the Lifetime Channel on TV, which means no solid characters, no particular style, weak
acting
all kinds of suggested sex but no-breasts and tushs (because boy, that would just catapult the film into the depths of sleaze wouldn't it?)
The boring choreography of a Segal film places his painful lack of
acting
skill in sharp relief.
Viola Essen at the time was with Ballet Theater, now American Ballet Theater, and a reasonably good dancer, but except for Dame Judith Anderson, the
acting
is amateurish and Checkov is completely over the top .... embarrassingly so!
All of the
acting
is very stilted but especially that of Norma Shearer who is still
acting
as though she were in a silent movie instead of a talkie.
The
acting
is extremely uneven, with the older professionals engaging your attention, and then the younger and less experienced actors looking like they are in a high school play.
Our hero doesn't display professional
acting
skills (but no one expected that from this bastard genre).
It must be said that the
acting
and interpretation is most heavily polluted by the TV-generated trend to speak in a severely muffled voice, not moving lips, straining tones, as emerged in the "That's real life"-productions and "Let's-raise-our audience-with-a-few-tears"-screen-playwriting.
The writing was horrific, and the
acting
was even worse.
(They destroy the villain with hair driers--but where are they plugged in?) It's a unique film though, and I enjoyed the
acting
of Courtney Draper and Tamara Hope.
Besides the acting, the "rewinding" and showing what happened on Ariel's and then Megan's point of view was quite interesting.
It did not age well, and this made the
acting
choppy, huge unbelievable holes in the script, but there is a few cool scenes like car chases, and a big gun fight.
Slow pacing, incredibly bad cinemetography, not very good singing (except from Robert Preston), an awful script, bad
acting
(except from Bea), and a horrible lead actress.
Its fairly well written and there's some OK
acting
in it but, really, it's a mess - not funny enough, not frightening enough.
The filmmaker should be credited for accuracy but there is little to say about the production and
acting
quality.
The
acting
was theatrical and the sound and picture quality was extremely poor.
The story line was terrible, not to mention the
acting.
The
acting
is very wooden, but at least they had a better "display" than some films in the shoestring budget category.
The
acting
was atrocious and the dialog was unintentionally hilarious, exactly what one would expect from an Ed Wood film.
It was sad to see Bela Lugosi having to say the ridiculous lines he had to say for this film, but it was kind of Ed Wood Jr. to at least give Mr. Lugosi an
acting
job at a time in Bela's life when he was penniless and a drug addict and no one else in Hollywood would hire him.
The
acting
was just as bad.. I've seen better
acting
in pornographic films.
The
acting
is terrible, and the movie looks like a bad indie film.
This movie was terrible not only was the plot weak, but the
acting
was unbelievable bad, and at times pathetic.
I have watched this movie on and off since it started playing about 1 hour ago, and i have to say, thats an hour of my life i wasted and will not be getting back, The
acting
is crap and the scripts need a serious look at, and whoever wrote them needs to be slapped, perhaps the TV will explode and put me out of my misery.....
Brilliant acting, excellent plot, wonderful special effects!
The
acting
is terrible, the special effects (as mentioned) are impossible to take seriously, and once you've seen one giant spider being blown up; you've seen them all, so it gets boring rather quickly.
From the (lack of) set design to the
acting
to the special effects, everything about this movie stinks.
Back
Next
Related words
Movie
Story
Great
There
Script
Really
About
Effects
Terrible
Would
Characters
Actors
Which
Could
Their
Direction
Horrible
Writing
Special
Other