Acting
in sentence
11391 examples of Acting in a sentence
4. Baron Harkonnen in over
acting
overdrive, screaming "I,m alive".
It is dreary and drab, has no excitement, the
acting
by Hulce is terrible as Hulce cannot pull off the proper accent required for this film.
effects that aren't very special,horrible dialogue,non acting.and
the rest is the same as every time: black haired girl, strange things happening with some media (photos), creepy
acting.
The best thing about the movie is the name, as it both describes the plot and the
acting.
So she's typecast as the nice girl next door, which she is, but, once again, she ain't up to snuff when it comes to
acting.
The nice thing about Greico's
acting
is that he bobs his had at every syllable as if he is counting how many words he gets to speak in the script.
Pretty good
acting
considering there wasn't much to go with.
The acting, directing and script are all third-rate - with the entire film playing out like an excuse for writer/director/star Larry Bishop to get laid.
the
acting
wasn't bad, but it wasn't that good either.
Whoever filled this stupid idea of
acting
and producing a movie in Himesh's head, which is always hidden under a cap, covering almost half of his face all the time ?
The
acting
is generally pretty decent for a SciFi channel movie.
So bad as good - not only the script is obvious, but the
acting
is not just poor, but pathetic.
It is full of bad lines, bad acting, bad slapstick, etc.
I never thought I could see worse
acting
than the purposefully badly acted scenes at the beginning of UHF, but this was it.
I knew it would be low budget... the
acting
sub-par... but hoped for a few gems to be sprinkled throughout.
This movie was horrible from all aspects: poor script (even accounting for a children's G-rated movie), poor production (the jittery camera shots made me feel nauseous for the first ten minutes), poor
acting
(perhaps they were "directed" to act cartoonish), and even poor sound quality (there are parts where the audio level seems fine, then you can't hear what the next actor is saying).
For sure there are plenty of mistakes: lackluster acting, rather boring and cliched and at times paradoxical script, and the stock B-movie sound and "special" effects.
The
acting
is pretty awful and the fight scenes are lame, but there is a love of sleaze in every frame and an understanding of what trash fans enjoy.
I thought the
acting
was terrible (was there any?), the plot was just idiotic, and the props were totally fakey.
A lot of marginal
acting
low budget horror, but usually still pretty good.
The
acting
by the three leads was beyond bad.
The man has a lovely baritone voice but no
acting
talent whatsoever and is a boring lump on screen.
In fact, their very
acting
seems frozen, sometimes amateur.
The plot is Deep Rising with cruddy effects and HORRID
acting.
The
acting
is quite possibly the very worst out of any b-movie ever made.
The only redeeming features are some moderately good acting, (although that said, Vanessa Redgrave seems to permanently render much the same performance whatever character she plays), and some good cinematography in places, but otherwise it is a bitter, bitter disappointment, and it could, and indeed should, have been a contemporary masterpiece.
Simon Callow should hang his head in shame and stick to
acting!
Slow-moving ponderous movie with terrible
acting
on the whole - but lovely locations & clothes to admire, and, of course, Timothy Dalton, who does a compelling job, as always.
Lazy writing, bad
acting
and wooden direction lead us to a 2005 Canadian-made TV movie called HUSH, not to be confused with about eight other movies using the same name.
Back
Next
Related words
Movie
Story
Great
There
Script
Really
About
Effects
Terrible
Would
Characters
Actors
Which
Could
Their
Direction
Horrible
Writing
Special
Other